Dodd Leslie G
Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 Jun;34(6):413-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.20470.
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a reliable, safe and cost-effective procedure with an established role in the diagnosis of various solid tissue neoplasms. However, the role of FNA in the diagnosis of primary bone tumors, including chondrosarcoma (CS) is controversial. To determine the accuracy of FNA as a diagnostic procedure, the author reviewed the institutional experience of a series of patients with CS who underwent FNA for diagnosis. The author's objectives were to determine the accuracy of the technique as well as possible limitations to sensitivity and specificity, and perhaps to suggest the most appropriate use for this procedure. Computer records and then subsequently archives of the department were searched for patients diagnosed and treated for CS between 1993 and 2003. Patients without adequate clinical follow-up, missing materials or records otherwise unavailable for review were eliminated from study. All patients who underwent FNA for a diagnosis had to have a subsequent histological confirmation to be included in the study. FNAs were largely performed with image-guided assistance. In those that were palpable, the aspiration was performed by the aspiration cytologist using standard methods. Histologic materials were processed according to standard methods. All cytological and histologic materials were reviewed for accuracy and appropriateness of diagnosis by the author. There were 34 aspirates from 32 patients with CS (2 patients with 2 aspirates each). Attempts at diagnoses were made from 27 primary lesions, 6 recurrent lesions, and one metastatic lesion. There were an additional two patients who were assigned a diagnosis of CS on FNA who ultimately were proven to have chondroblastic osteosarcoma. Of the primary CS, 18 were definitively diagnosed as CS or "malignant chondroid neoplasm," 8 of the aspirates were considered equivocal in that an additional diagnostic procedure was required to clarify or confirm the diagnosis. Two aspirates were diagnosed as negative. Both of the false negatives were due to inadequate sampling of the lesion on FNA. Diagnostic accuracy of FNA for primary CS in this series was 67% (18/27). Accuracy for recurrent or metastatic lesions was higher at 86% (6/7). FNA appears to be a reliable means of diagnosis of recurrent and/or metastatic CS in patients with a documented history. In primary lesions, however, the accuracy of the technique is lower. In addition, there are problems of sampling chondroid components of non-CS lesions such as this study's experience with chondroblastic osteosarcoma.
细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNA)是一种可靠、安全且具有成本效益的检查方法,在多种实体组织肿瘤的诊断中发挥着既定作用。然而,FNA在包括软骨肉瘤(CS)在内的原发性骨肿瘤诊断中的作用存在争议。为了确定FNA作为一种诊断方法的准确性,作者回顾了一系列因诊断目的接受FNA检查的CS患者的机构经验。作者的目的是确定该技术的准确性以及可能存在的敏感性和特异性方面的局限性,并可能为该检查方法提出最恰当的应用建议。检索了该科室1993年至2003年间诊断和治疗CS患者的计算机记录及随后的存档资料。没有充分临床随访、材料缺失或记录无法获取以供审查的患者被排除在研究之外。所有因诊断目的接受FNA检查的患者都必须随后有组织学确诊才能纳入研究。FNA大多在影像引导下进行。对于那些可触及的病变,由抽吸细胞病理学家采用标准方法进行抽吸。组织学材料按照标准方法处理。作者对所有细胞学和组织学材料的诊断准确性和恰当性进行了审查。有32例CS患者的34次抽吸活检(2例患者各有2次抽吸)。对27个原发性病变、6个复发性病变和1个转移性病变进行了诊断尝试。另外有2例患者FNA诊断为CS,但最终被证实患有软骨母细胞性骨肉瘤。在原发性CS中,18例被明确诊断为CS或“恶性软骨样肿瘤”,8次抽吸活检结果不明确,因为需要额外的诊断程序来明确或证实诊断。2次抽吸活检诊断为阴性。这2例假阴性均归因于FNA时病变取样不足。本系列中FNA对原发性CS的诊断准确性为67%(18/27)。对复发性或转移性病变的诊断准确性较高,为86%(6/7)。FNA似乎是诊断有记录病史患者复发性和/或转移性CS的可靠方法。然而,在原发性病变中,该技术的准确性较低。此外,存在对非CS病变软骨样成分取样方面的问题,如本研究中软骨母细胞性骨肉瘤的情况。