Suppr超能文献

基底/衬层的使用对修复体边缘渗漏的影响。

The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.

作者信息

von Fraunhofer J A, Marshall K R, Holman B G

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Maryland Dental School, USA.

出版信息

Gen Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr;54(2):106-9.

Abstract

Central to the success of a restoration is the quality of the restoration-dentin interfacial seal; any compromise of the seal can lead to secondary or recurrent decay. Class V restorations have a high leakage propensity and this study evaluates the effect of base/liner placement on leakage behavior. Class V intracoronal half enamel/half dentin preparations (3.0 x 2.0 x 2.0 mm) were cut in four groups (n = 10) of extracted human teeth with a new bur used for each cavity preparation. All teeth were single-rooted, single-canal anterior teeth. Base/liner usage differed between each group. The first group of teeth had no liner or base, while a liner was placed in the second group of teeth prior to conditioning and restoration. A base was placed in the third group of cavity preparations and both the base and liner were placed in the fourth group. After preparation, a small diameter bare-end PVC-insulated copper wire was inserted within the root canal of each tooth from the apex to firm contact with the pulp chamber roof. The tooth-wire interface and root surface was sealed and leakage was followed electrochemically for 35 days in 0.9% NaCl solution. All of the teeth leaked to some degree; however, teeth that were restored without liner or base demonstrated the smallest amount of leakage. The greatest leakage was noted in teeth restored with both a base and a liner; teeth restored with only a base showed greater leakage than those restored with only a liner. The findings indicate that the presence of a base and/or a liner results in greater leakage compared with intracoronal Class V preparations that were conditioned and restored only. The data suggest that placing both a base and a liner increases restoration leakage significantly.

摘要

修复成功的关键在于修复体与牙本质界面的封闭质量;封闭质量的任何妥协都可能导致继发龋或复发性龋。V类洞修复体有较高的微渗漏倾向,本研究评估垫底材料/衬层材料的使用对微渗漏行为的影响。用一种新的车针在四组(n = 10)拔除的人牙上制备V类冠内半釉质/半牙本质洞形(3.0×2.0×2.0 mm),每个洞形制备使用一根新车针。所有牙齿均为单根单根管的前牙。每组垫底材料/衬层材料的使用情况不同。第一组牙齿不使用衬层材料或垫底材料,而第二组牙齿在预备和修复前放置衬层材料。第三组洞形制备放置垫底材料,第四组同时放置垫底材料和衬层材料。制备完成后,将一根小直径的裸端聚氯乙烯绝缘铜线从根尖插入每颗牙齿的根管内,直至与髓室顶紧密接触。密封牙齿与铜线的界面以及牙根表面,并在0.9%氯化钠溶液中通过电化学方法监测微渗漏35天。所有牙齿均有一定程度的渗漏;然而,未使用衬层材料或垫底材料进行修复的牙齿渗漏量最小。使用垫底材料和衬层材料修复的牙齿渗漏量最大;仅使用垫底材料修复的牙齿比仅使用衬层材料修复的牙齿渗漏量更大。研究结果表明,与仅进行预备和修复的冠内V类洞形相比,使用垫底材料和/或衬层材料会导致更大的微渗漏。数据表明,同时使用垫底材料和衬层材料会显著增加修复体的微渗漏。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验