Wamsler Christine
Department of Housing Development and Management, Lund University, Sweden.
Disasters. 2006 Jun;30(2):151-77. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00313.x.
The effects of 'natural' disasters in cities can be worse than in other environments, with poor and marginalised urban communities in the developing world being most at risk. To avoid post-disaster destruction and the forced eviction of these communities, proactive and preventive urban planning, including housing, is required. This paper examines current perceptions and practices within international aid organisations regarding the existing and potential roles of urban planning as a tool for reducing disaster risk. It reveals that urban planning confronts many of the generic challenges to mainstreaming risk reduction in development planning. However, it faces additional barriers. The main reasons for the identified lack of integration of urban planning and risk reduction are, first, the marginal position of both fields within international aid organisations, and second, an incompatibility between the respective professional disciplines. To achieve better integration, a conceptual shift from conventional to non-traditional urban planning is proposed. This paper suggests related operative measures and initiatives to achieve this change.
城市中“自然”灾害的影响可能比其他环境更为严重,发展中国家贫困和边缘化的城市社区面临的风险最大。为避免这些社区在灾后遭到破坏并被强制驱逐,需要进行积极主动的城市规划,包括住房规划。本文审视了国际援助组织内部对于城市规划作为降低灾害风险工具的现有及潜在作用的当前认知和实践。研究表明,城市规划在将风险降低纳入发展规划的主流过程中面临许多普遍挑战。然而,它还面临其他障碍。城市规划与风险降低缺乏整合的主要原因,其一,这两个领域在国际援助组织中处于边缘地位;其二,各自的专业学科之间存在不相容性。为实现更好的整合,建议从传统城市规划向非传统城市规划进行观念转变。本文提出了实现这一转变的相关操作措施和倡议。