Guan Shi-bing, Hou Chun-lin, Chen De-song, Gu Yu-dong
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 May 5;119(9):707-12.
In recent years, transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve has become a routine procedure for restoration of shoulder abduction. However, the operation via the traditional supraclavicular anterior approach often leads to partial denervation of the trapezius muscle. The purpose of the study was to introduce transfer of the spinal accessory nerve through dorsal approach, using distal branch of the spinal accessory nerve, to repair the suprascapular nerve for restoration of shoulder abduction, and to observe its therapeutic effect.
From January to October 2003, a total of 11 patients with a brachial plexus injury and an intact or nearly intact spinal accessory nerve were treated by transferring the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve through dorsal approach. The patients were followed up for 18 to 26 months [mean (23.5 +/- 5.2) months] to evaluate their shoulder abduction and function of the trapezius muscle. The outcomes were compared with those of 26 patients treated with traditional anterior approach. And the data were analyzed by Student's t test using SPSS 10.5.
In the 11 patients, the spinal accessory nerves were transferred to the suprascapular nerve through the dorsal approach successfully. Intact function of the upper trapezius was achieved in all of them. In the patients, the location of the two nerves was relatively stable at the level of superior margin of the scapula, the mean distance between them was (4.2 +/- 1.4) cm, both the nerves could be easily dissected and end-to-end anastomosed without any tension. During the follow-up, the first electrophysiological sign of recovery of the infraspinatus appeared at (6.8 +/- 2.7) months and the first sign of restoration of the shoulder abduction at (7.6 +/- 2.9) months after the operation, which were earlier than that after the traditional operation [(8.7 +/- 2.4) months and (9.9 +/- 2.8) months, respectively; P < 0.05]. The postoperative shoulder abduction was 62.8 degrees +/- 12.6 degrees after transfer of the spinal accessory nerve, better than that after the traditional (51.6 degrees +/- 15.7 degrees). All the 11 patients could extend and externally rotate the shoulder almost normally.
The accessory nerve transfer through dorsal approach is a safe and reliable procedure for the treatment of brachial plexus injury. Its postoperative effect is confirmed, which is better than that of the traditional operation.
近年来,副神经转位至肩胛上神经已成为恢复肩部外展功能的常规手术。然而,传统的锁骨上前路手术常导致斜方肌部分失神经支配。本研究旨在介绍经后路利用副神经远端分支转位修复肩胛上神经以恢复肩部外展功能,并观察其治疗效果。
2003年1月至10月,共11例臂丛神经损伤且副神经完整或近乎完整的患者接受了经后路将副神经转位至肩胛上神经的手术。对患者进行了18至26个月[平均(23.5±5.2)个月]的随访,以评估其肩部外展及斜方肌功能。将结果与26例接受传统前路手术的患者进行比较。并使用SPSS 10.5软件通过Student's t检验对数据进行分析。
11例患者经后路成功将副神经转位至肩胛上神经。所有患者上斜方肌功能均得以保留。在这些患者中,两条神经在肩胛上缘水平位置相对稳定,它们之间的平均距离为(4.2±1.4)cm,两条神经均可轻松游离并进行无张力端端吻合。随访期间,术后冈下肌恢复的首个电生理征象出现在(6.8±2.7)个月,肩部外展恢复的首个征象出现在(7.6±2.9)个月,均早于传统手术[(分别为(8.7±2.4)个月和(9.9±2.8)个月;P<0.05]。副神经转位术后肩部外展角度为62.8°±12.6°,优于传统手术(51.6°±15.7°)。11例患者肩部后伸及外旋功能基本正常。
经后路副神经转位术治疗臂丛神经损伤安全可靠。其术后效果得到证实,优于传统手术。