Dawson Michael R W, Charrier Isabelle, Sturdy Christopher B
Department of Psychology, Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):3161-72. doi: 10.1121/1.2189028.
The "chick-a-dee" call of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) contains four note types, A, B, C, and D that have important functional roles. This provides strong motivation for studying the classification of acoustic components of the call into different note types. In this paper, the spectrograms from a sample of A, B, and C notes (370 in total) were each described as a set of 9 summary features. An artificial neural network was trained to identify note type on the basis of these features, and was able to obtain better than 98% accuracy. An internal analysis of this network revealed a distributed code in which different hidden units generated high activities to different subsets of notes. By combining these different sensitivities, the network could discriminate all three types of notes. The performance of this network was compared to a discriminant analysis of the same data. This analysis also achieved a high level of performance (95%). A comparison between the two approaches revealed some striking similarities, but also some intriguing differences. These results are discussed in terms of two related issues: developing a research tool for note classification, and developing a theory of how birds themselves might classify notes.
黑顶山雀(Poecile atricapillus)的“ chick-a-dee”叫声包含四种音符类型,即A、B、C和D,它们具有重要的功能作用。这为研究将叫声的声学成分分类为不同音符类型提供了强大的动力。在本文中,从A、B和C音符样本(总共370个)中得到的声谱图,每个都被描述为一组9个摘要特征。训练了一个人工神经网络,以根据这些特征识别音符类型,并且能够获得超过98%的准确率。对该网络的内部分析揭示了一种分布式编码,其中不同的隐藏单元对不同的音符子集产生高活动。通过组合这些不同的敏感性,该网络可以区分所有三种类型的音符。将该网络的性能与对相同数据的判别分析进行了比较。该分析也取得了较高的性能水平(95%)。两种方法之间的比较揭示了一些惊人的相似之处,但也有一些有趣的差异。将根据两个相关问题讨论这些结果:开发一种用于音符分类的研究工具,以及开发一种关于鸟类自身如何对音符进行分类的理论。