Wang Guan-Ying, McCloskey Diana T, Turcato Sally, Swigart Philip M, Simpson Paul C, Baker Anthony J
VA Medical Center, Cardiology Division (111C 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA 94121, USA.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Oct;291(4):H2013-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00167.2006. Epub 2006 May 26.
The left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) have differing hemodynamics and embryological origins, but it is unclear whether they are regulated differently. In particular, no previous studies have directly compared the LV versus RV myocardial inotropic responses to alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1)-AR) stimulation. We compared alpha(1)-AR inotropy of cardiac trabeculae from the LV versus RV of adult mouse hearts. As previously reported, for mouse RV trabeculae, alpha(1)-AR stimulation with phenylephrine (PE) caused a triphasic contractile response with overall negative inotropy. In marked contrast, LV trabeculae had an overall positive inotropic response to PE. Stimulation of a single subtype (alpha(1A)-AR) with A-61603 also mediated contrasting LV/RV inotropy, suggesting differential activation of multiple alpha(1)-AR-subtypes was not involved. Contrasting LV/RV alpha(1)-AR inotropy was not abolished by inhibiting protein kinase C, suggesting differential activation of PKC isoforms was not involved. However, contrasting LV/RV alpha(1)-AR inotropic responses did involve different effects on myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity: submaximal force of skinned trabeculae was increased by PE pretreatment for LV but was decreased by PE for RV. For LV myocardium, alpha(1)-AR-induced net positive inotropy was abolished by the myosin light chain kinase inhibitor ML-9. This study suggests that LV and RV myocardium have fundamentally different inotropic responses to alpha(1)-AR stimulation, involving different effects on myofilament function and myosin light chain phosphorylation.
左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)具有不同的血液动力学和胚胎学起源,但它们是否受到不同的调节尚不清楚。特别是,以前没有研究直接比较过左心室与右心室心肌对α(1)-肾上腺素能受体(α(1)-AR)刺激的变力反应。我们比较了成年小鼠心脏左心室与右心室心肌小梁的α(1)-AR变力作用。如先前报道的,对于小鼠右心室小梁,用去氧肾上腺素(PE)刺激α(1)-AR会引起三相收缩反应,总体上是负性变力作用。与之形成鲜明对比的是,左心室小梁对PE有总体正性变力反应。用A-61603刺激单一亚型(α(1A)-AR)也介导了左心室/右心室变力作用的差异,这表明多个α(1)-AR亚型的差异激活并不涉及其中。抑制蛋白激酶C并没有消除左心室/右心室α(1)-AR变力作用的差异,这表明蛋白激酶C亚型的差异激活并不涉及其中。然而,左心室/右心室α(1)-AR变力反应的差异确实涉及对肌丝Ca(2+)敏感性的不同影响:对于左心室,PE预处理可增加脱细胞小梁的亚最大力,而对于右心室,PE则会降低其亚最大力。对于左心室心肌,α(1)-AR诱导的净正性变力作用被肌球蛋白轻链激酶抑制剂ML-9消除。这项研究表明,左心室和右心室心肌对α(1)-AR刺激具有根本不同的变力反应,涉及对肌丝功能和肌球蛋白轻链磷酸化的不同影响。