• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对患有和未患有呼吸道疾病的儿童进行鼻咽冲洗液直接荧光抗体检测的效用。

Utility of direct fluorescent antibody testing of nasopharyngeal washes in children with and without respiratory tract illness.

作者信息

Greenhow Tara L, Weintrub Peggy Sue

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Jun;25(6):502-6. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000222401.21284.af.

DOI:10.1097/01.inf.0000222401.21284.af
PMID:16732147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) testing of nasopharyngeal wash specimens is a rapid and reliable means of diagnosing respiratory viral infection. The utility of DFA testing in the evaluation of febrile children without respiratory symptoms has not been critically evaluated. It is not known whether clinical or demographic factors apart from respiratory symptoms are associated with a positive DFA or whether a positive DFA is more likely to be associated with lower or upper respiratory tract symptoms (RTS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-series of 756 consecutive nasopharyngeal specimens with respiratory DFA testing performed at the University of California San Francisco from November 1, 2002 through October 31, 2003.

RESULTS

No RTS was a statistically significant predictor of negative DFA [odds ratio (OR), 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.004-0.2; P = 0.001] compared with lower RTS. Male subjects were more likely than female subjects to have a positive DFA (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-2.8; P = 0.02). Specimens collected from April to October were less likely to have a positive DFA (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.7; P = 0.001). Specimens collected at the time of hospital admission and during a hospitalization were less likely to have a positive DFA (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9; P = 0.01 and OR, 0.07; 95% CI 0.02-0.2; P = 0.001, respectively) compared with specimens collected in the outpatient setting.

CONCLUSION

The yield of testing children without respiratory tract illness is extremely low.

摘要

背景

对鼻咽冲洗标本进行直接荧光抗体(DFA)检测是诊断呼吸道病毒感染的一种快速且可靠的方法。DFA检测在评估无呼吸道症状的发热儿童中的效用尚未得到严格评估。除呼吸道症状外,尚不清楚临床或人口统计学因素是否与DFA阳性相关,也不清楚DFA阳性是否更可能与下呼吸道或上呼吸道症状(RTS)相关。

方法

这是一项回顾性病例系列研究,对2002年11月1日至2003年10月31日在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校进行呼吸道DFA检测的756份连续鼻咽标本进行了研究。

结果

与下呼吸道症状相比,无呼吸道症状是DFA阴性的统计学显著预测因素[比值比(OR),0.03;95%置信区间(CI),0.004 - 0.2;P = 0.001]。男性受试者DFA阳性的可能性高于女性受试者(OR 1.8;95% CI 1.1 - 2.8;P = 0.02)。4月至10月采集的标本DFA阳性的可能性较小(OR 0.4;95% CI 0.2 - 0.7;P = 0.001)。与门诊采集的标本相比,入院时和住院期间采集的标本DFA阳性的可能性较小(分别为OR 0.5;95% CI 0.3 - 0.9;P = 0.01和OR,0.07;95% CI 0.02 - 0.2;P = 0.001)。

结论

对无呼吸道疾病的儿童进行检测的阳性率极低。

相似文献

1
Utility of direct fluorescent antibody testing of nasopharyngeal washes in children with and without respiratory tract illness.对患有和未患有呼吸道疾病的儿童进行鼻咽冲洗液直接荧光抗体检测的效用。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Jun;25(6):502-6. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000222401.21284.af.
2
Comparison of conventional viral cultures with direct fluorescent antibody stains for diagnosis of community-acquired respiratory virus infections in hospitalized children.常规病毒培养与直接荧光抗体染色法在诊断住院儿童社区获得性呼吸道病毒感染中的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Sep;22(9):789-94. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000083823.43526.97.
3
[Investigation of respiratory syncytial virus by three different methods in children with lower respiratory tract infection].[三种不同方法对下呼吸道感染儿童呼吸道合胞病毒的检测]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009 Jul;43(3):433-8.
4
[A comparative study of direct immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, and culture for diagnosing metapneumovirus infection].[直接免疫荧光法、酶免疫测定法及培养法诊断人偏肺病毒感染的比较研究]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2009 Jun;27(6):322-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 May 6.
5
Practical implementation of a multiplex PCR for acute respiratory tract infections in children.用于儿童急性呼吸道感染的多重聚合酶链反应的实际应用
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;42(12):5596-603. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5596-5603.2004.
6
Development of a respiratory virus panel test for detection of twenty human respiratory viruses by use of multiplex PCR and a fluid microbead-based assay.开发一种用于通过多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)和基于流体微珠的检测方法检测20种人类呼吸道病毒的呼吸道病毒检测组合试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2965-70. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02436-06. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
7
Optimized detection of respiratory viruses in nasopharyngeal secretions.优化鼻咽分泌物中呼吸道病毒的检测
New Microbiol. 2003 Apr;26(2):133-40.
8
Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV): potential for bedside diagnosis.呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)快速诊断检测的评估:床旁诊断的潜力
Pediatrics. 1994 Jun;93(6 Pt 1):903-6.
9
Can we identify acute severe viral lower respiratory tract infection clinically?我们能否在临床上识别出急性重症病毒性下呼吸道感染?
Indian Pediatr. 2004 Mar;41(3):245-9.
10
Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and aspirates for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viruses in children.鼻咽部植绒拭子与吸取物用于儿童呼吸道病毒快速诊断的比较
J Clin Virol. 2008 May;42(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Parainfluenza virus as a cause of acute respiratory infection in hospitalized children.副流感病毒作为住院儿童急性呼吸道感染的一个病因
Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 25.