Suppr超能文献

小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征临床标准的评估

Evaluation of clinical criteria for the acute respiratory distress syndrome in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Rodriguez Martinez Carlos E, Guzman Maria C, Castillo Juan M, Sossa Monica P, Ojeda Paulina

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Santa Clara, Clinica Colsanitas, Clinica Infantil Colsubsidio, Bogota, Colombia.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul;7(4):335-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000224993.03233.63.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the validity of the North American-European Consensus Committee (NAECC) definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in pediatric patients. A secondary aim was to evaluate the threshold value for the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, used to determine which pediatric patients have ARDS.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Pediatric intensive care unit patients who required mechanical ventilation, died, and underwent autopsy between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2002 (n = 34).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clinical and chest radiograph information was collected retrospectively through chart review using a standardized data collection tool. Data included the criteria specified in the NAECC definition of ARDS and demographic information. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio of clinical diagnosis of ARDS compared with a pathologic diagnosis. The threshold value of PaO2/FiO2 was identified by plotting receiver operating characteristics curves and comparing the areas under the curves. The NAECC definition yielded a sensitivity of 80.7% (95% confidence interval 60-92%), specificity of 71.4% (95% confidence interval 30-95), positive predictive value of 91.3% (95% confidence interval 70-98), negative predictive value of 50.0% (95% confidence interval 20-78), and likelihood ratio of 2.82. A PaO2/FiO2 <150 had a slightly higher (but not significantly different) specificity for ARDS than a value >200 (71% vs. 86%, p = .15) without changing sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests the need for further research with larger number of children to identify an optimal Pao2/Fio2 threshold for identifying ARDS in this population.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目标是评估北美-欧洲共识委员会(NAECC)对小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的定义的有效性。次要目的是评估用于确定哪些小儿患者患有ARDS的PaO2/FiO2比值的阈值。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

儿科重症监护病房。

患者

1996年1月1日至2002年12月31日期间在儿科重症监护病房需要机械通气、死亡并接受尸检的患者(n = 34)。

干预措施

无。

测量与主要结果

通过使用标准化数据收集工具回顾病历,回顾性收集临床和胸部X光片信息。数据包括NAECC对ARDS定义中规定的标准和人口统计学信息。我们计算了与病理诊断相比ARDS临床诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和似然比。通过绘制受试者工作特征曲线并比较曲线下面积来确定PaO2/FiO2的阈值。NAECC定义的敏感性为80.7%(95%置信区间60-92%),特异性为71.4%(95%置信区间30-95),阳性预测值为91.3%(95%置信区间70-98),阴性预测值为50.0%(95%置信区间20-78),似然比为2.82。PaO2/FiO2<150对ARDS的特异性略高于>200的值(71%对86%,p = 0.15),但敏感性未改变。

结论

我们的研究表明,需要对更多儿童进行进一步研究,以确定该人群中识别ARDS的最佳PaO2/FiO2阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验