Grove-White Robin
Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Community Genet. 2006;9(3):170-7. doi: 10.1159/000092653.
The genetically modified crop controversies in Britain between 1997 and 2004 involved tensions surrounding the role of science in policy. The author of the paper was a member of the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission, a novel government advisory body created in 2000, which played a central role in negotiating new policy frameworks. The commission was also a key influence in the creation and execution of the three-pronged official 'GM dialogue' in 2002 and 2003. New understandings of 'uncertainty', both scientific and social, emerged as a result. The outcomes have relevance for the future political handling of other technological fields, including human genetics.
1997年至2004年间英国围绕转基因作物的争议涉及科学在政策中作用方面的紧张关系。该论文的作者是农业与环境生物技术委员会的成员,该委员会是2000年成立的一个新型政府咨询机构,在协商新政策框架方面发挥了核心作用。该委员会在2002年和2003年官方“转基因对话”的创建和实施过程中也产生了关键影响。由此出现了对科学和社会层面“不确定性”的新认识。这些成果与包括人类遗传学在内的其他技术领域未来的政治处理方式相关。