Cheng Li-Tao, Chen Wei, Tang Wen, Wang Tao
Division of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Nephron Clin Pract. 2006;104(1):c47-54. doi: 10.1159/000093670. Epub 2006 May 1.
Fluid overload is not uncommon in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Previous studies suggested that residual renal function (RRF) played an important role in maintaining fluid balance. However, good fluid status should be a balance between fluid intake and removal. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the effect of RRF on patients' fluid status after focusing on the balance between fluid intake and removal in CAPD patients.
In this cross-sectional study, 195 stable CAPD patients in a single center were included. Patients were divided into three groups according to their urine output: anuric group with urine < or =100 ml/day, oliguric group with urine < or =400 ml/day and UO >400 ml group with urine >400 ml/day. Fluid status was evaluated by bioimpedance analysis and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The sodium removal and plasma sodium concentration were also measured. All the patients were educated to try to achieve good volume control by focusing on salt and fluid intake and their removals.
There were 51, 31 and 113 patients in anuric, oliguric and UO >400 ml group, respectively. Anuric patients were older and had been on CAPD longer than that of the oliguric and UO >400 ml patients (p < 0.05). The urine output in the three groups were 9.28 +/- 22.68, 236.13 +/- 75.43 and 1,013.34 +/- 541.54 ml/day, respectively (p < 0.001). Bioimpedance analysis showed that the differences of extracellular water, intracellular water and total body water were not statistically significant among the three groups. However, there was significant difference in MAP among the three groups (MAP in anuric, oliguric and UO >400 ml groups were 93.27 +/- 13.35, 96.63 +/- 9.94 and 102.36 +/- 13.70 mm Hg, p < 0.01), and UO >400 ml group had higher MAP than anuric and oliguric groups (p < 0.05). The total sodium removal (renal + peritoneal) in anuric, oliguric and UO >400 ml groups were 96.44 +/- 60.18, 98.95 +/- 73.82 and 134.64 +/- 72.44 mmol/day, respectively (p < 0.01). The UO >400 ml group also had higher plasma sodium concentration than anuric and oliguric groups (plasma sodium in the three groups were 137.49 +/- 3.43, 137.82 +/- 2.63 and 139.15 +/- 3.30 mmol/l, respectively; p < 0.01).
This study showed that extracellular water among anuric, oliguric and UO >400 ml groups was not significantly different, which suggested that RRF may be not so important as expected in maintaining good volume status. The higher blood pressure in patients with higher RRF and higher sodium and fluid removal in the present study suggested restricting salt and fluid intake might be more important for better blood pressure control in CAPD patients.
持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者中液体超负荷并不少见。既往研究提示残余肾功能(RRF)在维持液体平衡中起重要作用。然而,良好的液体状态应是液体摄入与清除之间的平衡。因此,在本研究中,我们在关注CAPD患者液体摄入与清除平衡后,研究了RRF对患者液体状态的影响。
在这项横断面研究中,纳入了单中心的195例稳定的CAPD患者。根据尿量将患者分为三组:无尿组(尿量≤100 ml/天)、少尿组(尿量≤400 ml/天)和尿量>400 ml组(尿量>400 ml/天)。通过生物电阻抗分析和平均动脉压(MAP)评估液体状态。还测量了钠清除率和血浆钠浓度。对所有患者进行教育,使其通过关注盐和液体的摄入与清除来努力实现良好的容量控制。
无尿组、少尿组和尿量>400 ml组分别有51例、31例和113例患者。无尿患者年龄更大,CAPD治疗时间比少尿和尿量>400 ml的患者更长(p<0.05)。三组的尿量分别为9.28±22.68、236.13±75.43和1013.34±541.54 ml/天(p<0.001)。生物电阻抗分析显示,三组间细胞外液、细胞内液和总体液的差异无统计学意义。然而,三组间MAP有显著差异(无尿组、少尿组和尿量>400 ml组的MAP分别为93.27±13.35、96.63±9.94和102.36±13.70 mmHg,p<0.01),且尿量>400 ml组的MAP高于无尿组和少尿组(p<0.05)。无尿组、少尿组和尿量>400 ml组的总钠清除率(肾脏+腹膜)分别为96.44±60.18、98.95±73.82和134.64±72.44 mmol/天(p<0.01)。尿量>400 ml组的血浆钠浓度也高于无尿组和少尿组(三组的血浆钠分别为137.49±3.43、137.82±2.63和139.15±3.30 mmol/L,p<0.01)。
本研究表明,无尿组、少尿组和尿量>400 ml组的细胞外液无显著差异,这提示RRF在维持良好的容量状态方面可能没有预期的那么重要。本研究中RRF较高的患者血压较高,钠和液体清除较多,这表明限制盐和液体摄入可能对更好地控制CAPD患者的血压更为重要。