Suppr超能文献

利用地衣进行长期生物监测:比较不同采样程序的数据。

Long-term biomonitoring with lichens: comparing data from different sampling procedures.

作者信息

Frati Luisa, Brunialti Giorgio

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali G. Sarfatti, Univesità di Siena, Via Mattioli 4, I-53100, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2006 Aug;119(1-3):391-404. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-9032-5. Epub 2006 Jun 2.

Abstract

The results of 2 biomonitoring surveys carried out over a span of 7 years (1996-2003) in the Province of Ancona (central Italy) using the diversity of epiphytic lichens are reported. According to a recent standardisation process, in 2003 a different protocol was adopted, raising the problem of data comparability with the previous study. For this reason, a 'pilot study' was carried out in which the two sampling tactics were both used. The high correlation between biodiversity values proved by the results of this study, let to compare the two lichen diversity data set and to identify the impacts on lichen communities of temporal variations of atmospheric quality in the study area, showing a reduction of stations classified as 'altered' and an increase in stations classified as 'semi-altered'. Furthermore, possible reduction of the sampling effort was detected performing a study on the sampling density of the survey area, indicating in a 6 x 6 km grid the best density to adopt in order to save financial resources for the future.

摘要

报告了1996年至2003年期间在意大利中部安科纳省开展的为期7年的2次生物监测调查结果,该调查利用了附生地衣的多样性。根据最近的标准化流程,2003年采用了不同的方案,这就产生了与之前研究数据可比性的问题。因此,开展了一项“试点研究”,其中同时使用了两种采样策略。本研究结果证明生物多样性值之间具有高度相关性,从而得以比较两个地衣多样性数据集,并确定研究区域大气质量的时间变化对地衣群落的影响,结果显示被归类为“受干扰”的站点减少,而被归类为“半受干扰”的站点增加。此外,通过对调查区域的采样密度进行研究,发现有可能减少采样工作量,即在6×6公里的网格中指出为节省未来财政资源而应采用的最佳密度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验