Lyvers Michael
Department of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 May;25(3):269-76. doi: 10.1080/09595230600657758.
The controversy over possible MDMA-induced serotonergic neurotoxicity in human recreational ecstasy users is examined critically in light of recent research findings. Although the designs of such studies have improved considerably since the 1990s, the evidence to date remains equivocal for a number of reasons, including (1) inconsistent findings on the existence and reversibility of persistent ecstasy-related serotonergic and cognitive deficits; (2) lack of clear association between changes in brain imaging measures and functional deficits attributed to MDMA-induced neurotoxicity; (3) the contribution of concomitant cannabis or other drug use to both brain imaging abnormalities and cognitive deficits; (4) methodological shortcomings such as failure to adequately match samples of ecstasy users and controls; (5) the questionable relevance of animal models of MDMA-induced neurotoxicity to typical human patterns of ecstasy use; and (6) the potential role of inherent pre-drug deficits in serotonergic systems, impulse control and executive cognitive function that may predispose to excessive use of drugs including ecstasy. Given the retrospective nature of nearly all studies of ecstasy users to date, the controversy over whether MDMA has ever caused neurotoxicity or cognitive deficit in human ecstasy users is likely to continue for some time without resolution.
根据最近的研究结果,对摇头丸在人类摇头丸娱乐使用者中可能导致的血清素能神经毒性争议进行了批判性审视。尽管自20世纪90年代以来此类研究的设计有了很大改进,但由于多种原因,迄今为止的证据仍然模棱两可,包括:(1)关于与摇头丸相关的持续性血清素能和认知缺陷的存在及可逆性的研究结果不一致;(2)脑成像测量变化与归因于摇头丸诱导的神经毒性的功能缺陷之间缺乏明确关联;(3)同时使用大麻或其他药物对脑成像异常和认知缺陷的影响;(4)方法学上的缺点,如未能充分匹配摇头丸使用者和对照组样本;(5)摇头丸诱导的神经毒性动物模型与人类典型摇头丸使用模式的相关性存疑;以及(6)血清素能系统、冲动控制和执行认知功能中固有药物前缺陷的潜在作用,这些缺陷可能导致包括摇头丸在内的药物过度使用。鉴于迄今为止几乎所有关于摇头丸使用者的研究都具有回顾性,关于摇头丸是否曾在人类摇头丸使用者中导致神经毒性或认知缺陷的争议可能会持续一段时间而无法解决。