Suppr超能文献

在健康受试者一期试验中降低风险和剥削的策略。

Strategies to minimize risks and exploitation in phase one trials on healthy subjects.

作者信息

Shamoo Adil E, Resnik David B

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):W1-13. doi: 10.1080/15265160600686281.

Abstract

Most of the literature on phase one trials has focused on ethical and safety issues in research on patients with advanced cancer, but this article focuses on healthy, adult subjects. The article makes six specific recommendations for protecting the rights and welfare of healthy subjects in phase one trials: 1) because phase one trials are short in duration (usually 1 to 3 months), researchers should gather more data on the short-term and long-term risks of participation in phase one studies by healthy subjects; 2) researchers should develop strict inclusion/exclusion criteria that exclude unhealthy or vulnerable subjects, such as decisionally impaired people, in phase one studies; 3) subjects should not participate in more than one phase one study at the same time and should wait at least 30 days between participating in different studies; 4) researchers should develop a database to keep track of phase one participants; 5) subjects should be guaranteed a minimum wage equivalent to the equivalent type of unskilled labor, but there should be no upper limits on wages; and 6) subjects should be allowed to engage in collective bargaining with research sponsors.

摘要

大多数关于一期试验的文献都聚焦于晚期癌症患者研究中的伦理和安全问题,但本文关注的是健康的成年受试者。本文针对在一期试验中保护健康受试者的权利和福利提出了六项具体建议:1)由于一期试验持续时间较短(通常为1至3个月),研究人员应收集更多关于健康受试者参与一期研究的短期和长期风险的数据;2)研究人员应制定严格的纳入/排除标准,在一期研究中排除不健康或易受伤害的受试者,如决策能力受损者;3)受试者不应同时参与多项一期研究,且在参与不同研究之间应至少等待30天;4)研究人员应建立一个数据库来跟踪一期试验参与者;5)应保证受试者获得相当于非技术劳动力同等类型工作的最低工资,但工资不应设上限;6)应允许受试者与研究赞助商进行集体谈判。

相似文献

2
How not to rethink research ethics.如何不重新思考研究伦理。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590927697.
3
Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?不当诱导:无稽之谈?
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244959.
5
"Undue inducement' as coercive offers.“不当引诱”作为强制性提议。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):24-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160500245048.
6
Exploitation in payments to research subjects.对研究对象支付款项的滥用。
Bioethics. 2011 May;25(4):209-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01717.x.
7
Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?不当诱导:对支付报酬的唯一异议?
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160500245063.
8
A quartet of criticisms.四重批评。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):16-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244991.
9
On the Alleged Right to Participate in High-Risk Research.论所谓的参与高风险研究的权利。
Bioethics. 2015 Sep;29(7):451-61. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12146. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
Should trial subjects be unionised?试验对象应该加入工会吗?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul-Sep;5(3):138-40. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2008.050.

引用本文的文献

2
The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants.研究参与者付费的伦理剖析。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):449-464. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10092-1. Epub 2022 May 24.

本文引用的文献

5
Ending concerns about undue inducement.消除对不当诱导的担忧。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Spring;32(1):100-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00453.x.
6
Ethics of vaccine research.
Nat Immunol. 2004 May;5(5):465-8. doi: 10.1038/ni0504-465.
7
Data safety and monitoring boards.数据安全与监测委员会
N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 11;350(11):1143-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb033476.
8
Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.生物伦理学、脆弱性与保护
Bioethics. 2003 Oct;17(5-6):472-86. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00362.
9
Research-related injury: problems and solutions.与研究相关的伤害:问题与解决方案。
J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Fall;31(3):419-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00104.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验