Suppr超能文献

在健康受试者一期试验中降低风险和剥削的策略。

Strategies to minimize risks and exploitation in phase one trials on healthy subjects.

作者信息

Shamoo Adil E, Resnik David B

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):W1-13. doi: 10.1080/15265160600686281.

Abstract

Most of the literature on phase one trials has focused on ethical and safety issues in research on patients with advanced cancer, but this article focuses on healthy, adult subjects. The article makes six specific recommendations for protecting the rights and welfare of healthy subjects in phase one trials: 1) because phase one trials are short in duration (usually 1 to 3 months), researchers should gather more data on the short-term and long-term risks of participation in phase one studies by healthy subjects; 2) researchers should develop strict inclusion/exclusion criteria that exclude unhealthy or vulnerable subjects, such as decisionally impaired people, in phase one studies; 3) subjects should not participate in more than one phase one study at the same time and should wait at least 30 days between participating in different studies; 4) researchers should develop a database to keep track of phase one participants; 5) subjects should be guaranteed a minimum wage equivalent to the equivalent type of unskilled labor, but there should be no upper limits on wages; and 6) subjects should be allowed to engage in collective bargaining with research sponsors.

摘要

大多数关于一期试验的文献都聚焦于晚期癌症患者研究中的伦理和安全问题,但本文关注的是健康的成年受试者。本文针对在一期试验中保护健康受试者的权利和福利提出了六项具体建议:1)由于一期试验持续时间较短(通常为1至3个月),研究人员应收集更多关于健康受试者参与一期研究的短期和长期风险的数据;2)研究人员应制定严格的纳入/排除标准,在一期研究中排除不健康或易受伤害的受试者,如决策能力受损者;3)受试者不应同时参与多项一期研究,且在参与不同研究之间应至少等待30天;4)研究人员应建立一个数据库来跟踪一期试验参与者;5)应保证受试者获得相当于非技术劳动力同等类型工作的最低工资,但工资不应设上限;6)应允许受试者与研究赞助商进行集体谈判。

相似文献

1
Strategies to minimize risks and exploitation in phase one trials on healthy subjects.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):W1-13. doi: 10.1080/15265160600686281.
2
How not to rethink research ethics.
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590927697.
3
Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244959.
4
Serial Participation and the Ethics of Phase 1 Healthy Volunteer Research.
J Med Philos. 2018 Jan 12;43(1):83-114. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx033.
5
"Undue inducement' as coercive offers.
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):24-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160500245048.
6
Exploitation in payments to research subjects.
Bioethics. 2011 May;25(4):209-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01717.x.
7
Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160500245063.
8
A quartet of criticisms.
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):16-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244991.
9
On the Alleged Right to Participate in High-Risk Research.
Bioethics. 2015 Sep;29(7):451-61. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12146. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
Should trial subjects be unionised?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul-Sep;5(3):138-40. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2008.050.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular Interventions in Patients With Active and Advanced Malignancy: An Updated Review.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2024 Jul 2;14(4):34-41. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1369. eCollection 2024.
2
The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants.
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):449-464. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10092-1. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
6
Informal professionalization of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials in Russia.
Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;16(6):563-570. doi: 10.1177/1740774519877851. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
8
Serial Participation and the Ethics of Phase 1 Healthy Volunteer Research.
J Med Philos. 2018 Jan 12;43(1):83-114. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx033.
9
Bioethical Issues in Providing Financial Incentives to Research Participants.
Medicoleg Bioeth. 2015 Jun 24;5:35-41. doi: 10.2147/MB.S70416.
10
Risks of phase I research with healthy participants: A systematic review.
Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):149-60. doi: 10.1177/1740774515602868. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Pesticide testing on human subjects: weighing benefits and risks.
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jul;113(7):813-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7720.
3
When experiments go wrong: the U.S. perspective.
J Clin Ethics. 2004 Spring;15(1):22-9.
4
The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process.
J Med Ethics. 2004 Jun;30(3):293-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.001594.
5
Ending concerns about undue inducement.
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Spring;32(1):100-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00453.x.
6
Ethics of vaccine research.
Nat Immunol. 2004 May;5(5):465-8. doi: 10.1038/ni0504-465.
7
Data safety and monitoring boards.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 11;350(11):1143-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb033476.
8
Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.
Bioethics. 2003 Oct;17(5-6):472-86. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00362.
9
Research-related injury: problems and solutions.
J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Fall;31(3):419-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00104.x.
10
Adverse event reporting in clinical trials: room for improvement.
Med J Aust. 2003 Oct 20;179(8):426-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05621.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验