Mathis Stephanie C, Slone Donnie E, Lynch Timothy M, Hughes Faith E, Clark Carol K
Peterson and Smith Equine Hospital, Ocala, FL 34474, USA.
Vet Surg. 2006 Jun;35(4):356-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00157.x.
To evaluate the relationship of colonic luminal pressure (CLP) measurements to outcome in horses with large colon volvulus (LCV) after either manual correction or large colon resection and anastomosis (LCRA).
Retrospective study.
Horses (n=57) that had LCV.
Records for horses with LCV (March 1997-December 2003) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were strangulating LCV proximal to the cecocolic ligament (>270 degrees), recorded CLP, and successful recovery from anesthesia. CLP measurements and survival/mortality rates were compared between horses that had manual correction (M) or LCRA (R).
Of 57 horses, 27 had M and 30 had LCRA. For group M, CLP measurements had a sensitivity of 0.60 and specificity of 0.77 for predicting survival, whereas for group R, sensitivity was 0.50 and specificity was 0.54.
In our LCV population, elevated CLP measurements had poor accuracy for predicting outcome in horses after surgical correction, especially after LCRA.
CLP measurements based on a single hospital population of horses with LCV should be used with caution for other hospital populations of LCV. CLP may be only one of many variables needed for predicting outcome of horses with strangulating LCV, especially after LCRA.
评估结肠腔内压力(CLP)测量值与患有大结肠扭转(LCV)的马匹在手动矫正或大结肠切除吻合术(LCRA)后的预后之间的关系。
回顾性研究。
患有LCV的马匹(n = 57)。
回顾了1997年3月至2003年12月患有LCV的马匹的记录。纳入标准为盲肠结肠韧带近端绞窄性LCV(>270度)、记录的CLP以及麻醉后成功恢复。比较了接受手动矫正(M)或LCRA(R)的马匹之间的CLP测量值和生存/死亡率。
57匹马中,27匹接受了M,30匹接受了LCRA。对于M组,CLP测量值预测生存的敏感性为0.60,特异性为0.77;而对于R组,敏感性为0.50,特异性为0.54。
在我们的LCV群体中,CLP测量值升高对手术矫正后马匹预后的预测准确性较差,尤其是在LCRA之后。
基于单一医院患有LCV的马匹群体的CLP测量值,在用于其他医院的LCV群体时应谨慎使用。CLP可能只是预测绞窄性LCV马匹预后所需的众多变量之一,尤其是在LCRA之后。