Caird Michelle S, Flynn John M, Leung Y Leo, Millman Jennifer E, D'Italia Joann G, Dormans John P
Division of Orthopaedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1251-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00216.
Distinguishing septic arthritis from transient synovitis of the hip in children can be challenging. Authors of recent retrospective studies have used presenting factors to establish algorithms for predicting septic arthritis of the hip in children. This study differs from previous work in three ways: data were collected prospectively, C-reactive protein levels were recorded, and the focus was on children in whom the findings were so suspicious for septic arthritis that hip aspiration was performed.
Over four years, we prospectively collected data on every child (a total of fifty-three) who underwent hip aspiration because of a suspicion of septic arthritis at our institution. Diagnoses of confirmed septic arthritis, presumed septic arthritis, and transient synovitis were determined on the basis of the results of Gram staining, culture, and a cell count of the hip aspirate. Presenting factors and laboratory values were recorded. To evaluate the strength of predictors, we performed univariate and multivariate analysis on data from forty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria.
Univariate analysis showed that fever, the C-reactive protein level, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate were strongly associated with the final diagnosis (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were found to be significant predictors. However, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was not independent of the C-reactive protein level on backward elimination, and the C-reactive protein level was the only risk factor that was strongly associated with the outcome at a 5% significance level. Patients with five predictive factors had a 98% chance of having septic arthritis, those with four factors had a 93% chance, and those with three factors had an 83% chance.
This prospective study of children who presented with findings that were highly suspicious for septic arthritis of the hip builds on the work of previous authors. We found fever (an oral temperature >38.5 degrees C) was the best predictor of septic arthritis followed by an elevated C-reactive protein level, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, refusal to bear weight, and an elevated serum white blood-cell count. In our study group, a C-reactive protein level of >2.0 mg/dL (>20 mg/L) was a strong independent risk factor and a valuable tool for assessing and diagnosing children suspected of having septic arthritis of the hip.
区分儿童化脓性关节炎与髋关节一过性滑膜炎具有挑战性。近期回顾性研究的作者们利用呈现出的因素建立了预测儿童髋关节化脓性关节炎的算法。本研究在三个方面与以往工作不同:数据是前瞻性收集的,记录了C反应蛋白水平,并且重点关注那些临床表现高度怀疑为化脓性关节炎而进行了髋关节穿刺抽吸的儿童。
在四年时间里,我们前瞻性收集了在我们机构因怀疑化脓性关节炎而接受髋关节穿刺抽吸的每一名儿童(共53名)的数据。根据髋关节穿刺抽吸物的革兰氏染色、培养及细胞计数结果确定确诊的化脓性关节炎、疑似化脓性关节炎和一过性滑膜炎的诊断。记录呈现出的因素和实验室检查值。为评估预测因素的强度,我们对符合纳入标准的48例患者的数据进行了单因素和多因素分析。
单因素分析显示,发热、C反应蛋白水平和红细胞沉降率与最终诊断密切相关(p<0.05)。多因素分析发现,C反应蛋白水平和红细胞沉降率是显著的预测因素。然而,在向后逐步回归分析中,红细胞沉降率并非独立于C反应蛋白水平,并且C反应蛋白水平是唯一在5%显著性水平上与结果密切相关的危险因素。具有五个预测因素的患者患化脓性关节炎的几率为98%,具有四个因素的患者为93%,具有三个因素的患者为83%。
这项针对临床表现高度怀疑为髋关节化脓性关节炎儿童的前瞻性研究是在以往作者工作的基础上进行的。我们发现发热(口腔温度>38.5℃)是化脓性关节炎的最佳预测因素,其次是C反应蛋白水平升高、红细胞沉降率升高、拒绝负重和血清白细胞计数升高。在我们的研究组中,C反应蛋白水平>2.0mg/dL(>20mg/L)是一个强有力的独立危险因素,也是评估和诊断疑似髋关节化脓性关节炎儿童的一个有价值的工具。