• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CPD染色:一种检测植物中核仁组织区(NORs)和其他富含GC的染色体区域的有效技术。

CPD staining: an effective technique for detection of NORs and other GC-rich chromosomal regions in plants.

作者信息

She C W, Liu J Y, Song Y C

机构信息

Key Laboratory of MOE for Plant Developmental Biology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China.

出版信息

Biotech Histochem. 2006 Jan-Feb;81(1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/10520290600661414.

DOI:10.1080/10520290600661414
PMID:16760123
Abstract

Mitotic chromosome spreads of 16 plant species belonging to six families were analyzed using an improved combined PI and DAPI (CPD) staining procedure. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 45S rDNA probe was conducted sequentially on the same spreads to evaluate the efficiency and sensitivity of the technique. Fluorochrome staining with chromomycin A3 (CMA)-DAPI also was conducted to clarify the properties of the sequences involved in the CPD banded regions. Our results revealed that all of the NORs (rDNA sites) in the species tested were efficiently shown as red bands by CPD staining, and the number and position of the bands corresponded precisely to those of the 45S rDNA FISH signals, indicating that the detection sensitivity of CPD staining is similar to that of FISH. In 10 of the species tested including Aegilops squarrosa, Allium sativum, Oryza sativum ssp. indica, Oryza officinalis, Pisum sativum, Secale cereale, Setaria italica, Sorghum vulgare, Vicia faba and Zea mays, CPD bands were exhibited exclusively in their NORs, while in other six species including Hordeum vulgare, Allium cepa, Psophocarpus tetragonolobus, Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassica oleracea var. capitata and Lycopersicon esculentum, CPD bands appeared in chromosomal regions other than their NORs. The CPD bands were in accordance with the CMA bands in all species tested, indicating GC-rich sequences in the CPD bands and that the improved CPD staining procedure is specific for GC-rich regions in plant genomes. Our investigation not only elucidated the banding mechanisms of CPD, but also demonstrated that the CPD staining technique, which may be preferable to CMA staining, is an effective tool for detecting NORs and other GC-rich chromosomal regions in plants.

摘要

使用改进的碘化丙啶(PI)和4′,6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚(DAPI)联合染色程序(CPD),对属于六个科的16种植物的有丝分裂染色体铺片进行了分析。在相同的铺片上依次进行45S核糖体DNA(rDNA)探针的荧光原位杂交(FISH),以评估该技术的效率和灵敏度。还进行了放线菌素A3(CMA)-DAPI荧光染色,以阐明CPD带纹区域中相关序列的特性。我们的结果表明,通过CPD染色,测试物种中的所有核仁组织区(rDNA位点)均有效地显示为红色带,且带的数量和位置与45S rDNA FISH信号的数量和位置精确对应,这表明CPD染色的检测灵敏度与FISH相似。在测试的10个物种中,包括粗山羊草、大蒜、籼稻、药用野生稻、豌豆、黑麦、粟、高粱、蚕豆和玉米,CPD带仅在其核仁组织区出现,而在其他6个物种中,包括大麦、洋葱、四棱豆、拟南芥、甘蓝型油菜和番茄,CPD带出现在其核仁组织区以外的染色体区域。在所有测试物种中,CPD带与CMA带一致,表明CPD带中富含鸟嘌呤和胞嘧啶的序列,且改进的CPD染色程序对植物基因组中富含GC的区域具有特异性。我们的研究不仅阐明了CPD的带纹机制,还证明了CPD染色技术可能比CMA染色更具优势,是检测植物核仁组织区和其他富含GC的染色体区域的有效工具。

相似文献

1
CPD staining: an effective technique for detection of NORs and other GC-rich chromosomal regions in plants.CPD染色:一种检测植物中核仁组织区(NORs)和其他富含GC的染色体区域的有效技术。
Biotech Histochem. 2006 Jan-Feb;81(1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/10520290600661414.
2
[Chromosome CPD(PI/DAPI)- and CMA/DAPI-banding patterns in Allium cepa L].[洋葱(Allium cepa L.)染色体的CPD(PI/DAPI)和CMA/DAPI带型]
Genetika. 2002 Apr;38(4):489-96.
3
The meaning of DAPI bands observed after C-banding and FISH procedures.C带和荧光原位杂交(FISH)程序后观察到的DAPI带的意义。
Biotech Histochem. 2010 Apr;85(2):115-25. doi: 10.1080/10520290903149596.
4
A GC-rich satellite DNA and karyology of the bivalve mollusk Donax trunculus: a dominance of GC-rich heterochromatin.双壳贝类软体动物紫彩血蛤富含鸟嘌呤和胞嘧啶的卫星DNA与核型分析:富含鸟嘌呤和胞嘧啶的异染色质占主导地位。
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;124(1):63-71. doi: 10.1159/000200089. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
5
GC-rich heterochromatin in silver stained nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) fluoresces with Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining in three species of teleostean fishes (Pisces).在三种硬骨鱼类(双鱼座)中,银染核仁组织区(NORs)中富含GC的异染色质在经放线菌素A3(CMA3)染色后会发出荧光。
Indian J Exp Biol. 2007 May;45(5):413-8.
6
The distribution of repetitive DNAs along chromosomes in plants revealed by self-genomic in situ hybridization.通过自身基因组原位杂交揭示植物中重复DNA沿染色体的分布。
J Genet Genomics. 2007 May;34(5):437-48. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60048-4.
7
Karyotype analysis of eight cultivated Allium species.八种栽培葱属植物的核型分析。
J Appl Genet. 2019 Feb;60(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s13353-018-0474-1. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
8
A new chromosome fluorescence banding technique combining DAPI staining with image analysis in plants.一种将DAPI染色与图像分析相结合的植物染色体荧光显带新技术。
Chromosoma. 2004 Aug;113(1):16-21. doi: 10.1007/s00412-004-0289-1. Epub 2004 Jun 9.
9
Detection of nucleolar organizer and mitochondrial DNA insertion regions based on the isochore map of Arabidopsis thaliana.基于拟南芥等密度区图谱检测核仁组织区和线粒体DNA插入区域。
FEBS J. 2005 Jul;272(13):3328-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04748.x.
10
CPD banding patterns and identification of 45S rDNA sites in tomato.番茄中CPD带型及45S rDNA位点的鉴定
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2005 Oct;32(10):1101-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative karyotype analysis of eight Cucurbitaceae crops using fluorochrome banding and 45S rDNA-FISH.利用荧光带型分析和45S rDNA-FISH技术对八种葫芦科作物进行核型比较分析。
Comp Cytogenet. 2023 Feb 9;17(1):31-58. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v17.i1.99236. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparative molecular cytogenetic characterization of five wild species (Fabaceae).五个野生豆科物种的比较分子细胞遗传学特征分析
Comp Cytogenet. 2020 Jun 26;14(2):243-264. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v14i2.51154. eCollection 2020.
3
Molecular cytogenetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of four species (Poaceae).
四种禾本科植物的分子细胞遗传学特征及系统发育分析
Comp Cytogenet. 2019 Aug 9;13(3):211-230. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v13i3.35346. eCollection 2019.
4
Molecular cytogenetic characterization and comparison of the two cultivated species (Fabaceae).两种栽培豆科植物的分子细胞遗传学特征及比较
Comp Cytogenet. 2017 Sep 12;11(4):579-600. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i4.13604. eCollection 2017.