Critique of a Cochrane review.
作者信息
Trinh Kien, Phillips Shauna-Dae
机构信息
School of Medicine, McMaster University, Ancaster Sports Medicine Centre, Ancaster, Ontario, Canada.
出版信息
Explore (NY). 2006 Jan;2(1):64-6. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2005.10.016.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Critique of a Cochrane review.
Explore (NY). 2006 Jan;2(1):64-6. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2005.10.016.
2
Commentary on the cochrane review of message for neck pain.
Explore (NY). 2008 May-Jun;4(3):213-4. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2008.02.013.
3
Updating systematic reviews.
Explore (NY). 2006 Jul-Aug;2(4):363-4. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2006.05.016.
4
Clinical inquiries. What treatment works best for tennis elbow?
J Fam Pract. 2009 Mar;58(3):159-61.
5
[Significance of Cochrane collaboration for evidence-based medicine].
Lakartidningen. 2000 Jun 28;97(26-27):3180-2.
6
Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.005. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
7
[Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group--1998 activities].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Oct 25;161(43):5905-6.
8
A negative but positive Cochrane review.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Apr;32(2):137-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01395.x.
9
Repetitive shock wave therapy for lateral elbow tendinopathy (tennis elbow): a systematic and qualitative analysis.
Br Med Bull. 2007;83:355-78. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldm019. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
10
Questions and answers in evidence-based patient care.
Br Dent J. 2007 Sep 22;203(6):309-19. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.834.
Zotero 插件