Brugmann Samantha A, Tapadia Minal D, Helms Jill A
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;73:1-42. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)73001-5.
The prevailing approach within the field of craniofacial development is focused on finding a balance between tissues (e.g., facial epithelia, neuroectoderm, and neural crest) and molecules (e.g., bone morphogenetic proteins, fibroblast growth factors, Wnts) that play a role in sculpting the face. We are rapidly learning that neither these tissues nor molecular signals are able to act in isolation; in fact, molecular cues are constantly reciprocating signals between the epithelia and the neural crest in order to pattern and mold facial structures. More recently, it has been proposed that this crosstalk is often mediated and organized by discrete organizing centers within the tissues that are able to act as a self-contained unit of developmental potential (e.g., the rhombomere and perhaps the ectomere). Whatever the molecules are and however they are interpreted by these tissues, it appears that there is a remarkably conserved mechanism for setting up the initial organization of the facial prominences between species. Regardless of species, all vertebrates appear to have the same basic bauplan. However, sometime during mid-gestation, the vertebrate face begins to exhibit species-specific variations, in large part due to differences in the rates of growth and differentiation of cells comprising the facial prominences. How do these differences arise? Are they due to late changes in molecular signaling within the facial prominences themselves? Or are these late changes a reflection of earlier, more subtle alterations in boundaries and fields that are established at the earliest stages of head formation? We do not have clear answers to these questions yet, but in this chapter we present new studies that shed light on this age-old question. This chapter aims to present the known signals, both on a molecular and cellular level, responsible for craniofacial development while bringing to light the events that may serve to create difference in facial morphology seen from species to species.
颅面发育领域目前流行的方法集中在寻找组织(如面部上皮、神经外胚层和神经嵴)和分子(如骨形态发生蛋白、成纤维细胞生长因子、Wnt信号蛋白)之间的平衡,这些组织和分子在塑造面部过程中发挥作用。我们很快认识到,这些组织和分子信号都无法单独起作用;事实上,分子信号在不断地在上皮和神经嵴之间相互传递,以形成和塑造面部结构。最近,有人提出这种相互作用通常由组织内离散的组织中心介导和组织,这些中心能够作为一个独立的发育潜能单位发挥作用(如菱脑节,可能还有外胚节)。无论这些分子是什么,以及它们如何被这些组织解读,似乎在不同物种之间建立面部突起的初始组织存在一种非常保守的机制。无论物种如何,所有脊椎动物似乎都有相同的基本蓝图。然而,在妊娠中期的某个时候,脊椎动物的面部开始出现物种特异性变异,这在很大程度上是由于构成面部突起的细胞生长和分化速度不同。这些差异是如何产生的?它们是由于面部突起本身分子信号的后期变化吗?还是这些后期变化反映了在头部形成最早阶段建立的边界和区域中更早、更微妙的改变?我们目前还没有这些问题的明确答案,但在本章中,我们将介绍一些新的研究,这些研究为这个古老的问题提供了线索。本章旨在从分子和细胞水平介绍已知的负责颅面发育的信号,同时揭示可能导致不同物种面部形态差异的事件。