Fitzgerald J D
Materia Medica, Mere Croft, Cheshire, UK.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1991 Jun;5(3):561-76. doi: 10.1007/BF03029726.
Despite the fact that beta blockers were introduced into clinical practice 25 years ago, new beta blockers with differing kinetic and dynamic profiles continue to be developed and marketed. This overview assesses some of the more extensively studied agents from the point of view of proof of utility and the validity of claims for therapeutic advances. The clinical data suggests that despite the expectations of improvements based on kinetic and dynamic consideration, none of the newer agents have been shown unequivocally, either in terms of efficiency or tolerability, to be an advance over the reference agents, the beta 1 antagonists atenolol and metoprolol. This may be either because such improvements will not occur or because of shortcomings in the design and duration of comparative studies. There are trends to suggest that celiprolol has lesser effects on bronchial function and that it has a lesser impact on lipoprotein profiles. Approaches are suggested that might enable clinicians to appraise for themselves the validity of claims for the improved efficiency of new beta blockers.
尽管β受体阻滞剂在25年前就已应用于临床实践,但具有不同动力学和动态特性的新型β受体阻滞剂仍在不断研发和上市。本综述从效用证据和治疗进展声明的有效性角度,对一些研究较为广泛的药物进行了评估。临床数据表明,尽管基于动力学和动态因素预期会有所改善,但无论是在疗效还是耐受性方面,均未明确显示任何一种新型药物比对照药物β1拮抗剂阿替洛尔和美托洛尔更具优势。这可能是因为此类改善不会出现,也可能是由于比较研究的设计和持续时间存在缺陷。有趋势表明,塞利洛尔对支气管功能的影响较小,对脂蛋白谱的影响也较小。文中提出了一些方法,可使临床医生自行评估新型β受体阻滞剂疗效改善声明的有效性。