Should biological evidence or DNA be retained by forensic science laboratories after profiling? No, except under narrow legislatively-stipulated conditions.
作者信息
Gaensslen R E
机构信息
University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
出版信息
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Summer;34(2):375-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00042.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Should biological evidence or DNA be retained by forensic science laboratories after profiling? No, except under narrow legislatively-stipulated conditions.
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Summer;34(2):375-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00042.x.
2
Retention of offender DNA samples necessary to ensure and monitor quality of forensic DNA efforts: appropriate safeguards exist to protect the DNA samples from misuse.
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Summer;34(2):380-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00043.x.
3
Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed). 2000 Apr 13;92(99):1, 9.
4
Expanding databases, declining liberties.
Genewatch. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):3-8, 18.
5
Expanding file of DNA riles Britain.
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed). 2000 Sep 7;92(201):1, 9.
6
I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Chic Kent Law Rev. 1999;75:61-82.
7
'Wonderment and dread': representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases.
New Genet Soc. 2004 Aug;23(2):205-23. doi: 10.1080/1463677042000237035.
8
Will DNA profiling fuel prejudice?
New Sci. 2005;186(2494):12-3.
9
Reclaiming "abandoned" DNA: the Fourth Amendment and genetic privacy.
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2006 Winter;100(2):857-84.
10
Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets.
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev. 2003 Fall;65(1):129-43. doi: 10.5195/lawreview.2003.25.
引用本文的文献
1
The future of forensic DNA analysis.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 5;370(1674). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0252.
2
GINA and preemployment criminal background checks.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb;40(1):15-9. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0219.
Zotero 插件