Wright James A, Gundry Stephen W, Conroy Ronan, Wood Daniel, Du Preez Martella, Ferro-Luzzi Anna, Genthe Bettina, Kirimi Misheck, Moyo Sibonginkosi, Mutisi Charles, Ndamba Jerikias, Potgieter Natasha
Department of Geography, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2006 Mar;24(1):8-16.
The study was conducted to assess the effect of definition of episode on diarrhoeal morbidity and to develop a means of adjusting estimates of morbidity for the definition of episode used. This paper reports on a cohort study of 374 children, aged 9-32 months, in three African countries, which recorded frequency and consistency of stool over a seven-month period. Different definitions of episode were applied to these data to assess their effect on annualized diarrhoeal morbidity. Adjustment factors were then derived that corrected morbidity for non-standard definitions of episode. Applying non-standard definitions of episode gave estimates of an annualized number of episodes between 38% and 137% of the internationally-accepted definition. Researchers should be encouraged to use the standard definition of episode of diarrhoea and to use appropriate field protocols. Where this is not possible, correction factors should be applied, particularly where estimates of diarrhoeal morbidity are pooled in systematic reviews.
开展这项研究是为了评估腹泻发作定义对腹泻发病率的影响,并开发一种方法来调整因所用发作定义而产生的发病率估计值。本文报告了一项针对三个非洲国家374名年龄在9至32个月之间儿童的队列研究,该研究记录了七个月期间的粪便频率和稠度。将不同的发作定义应用于这些数据,以评估其对年化腹泻发病率的影响。然后得出调整因子,用于校正非标准发作定义下的发病率。应用非标准发作定义得出的年化发作次数估计值在国际公认定义的38%至137%之间。应鼓励研究人员使用腹泻发作的标准定义,并采用适当的现场方案。如果无法做到这一点,则应应用校正因子,特别是在系统评价中汇总腹泻发病率估计值的情况下。