O'Brien William D, Simpson Douglas G, Frizzell Leon A, Zachary James F
Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, 405 N Mathews, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Jul;25(7):873-82. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.7.873.
The purpose of this study was to enhance the findings of an earlier ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage study (Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:1625-1634) that estimated pressure thresholds as a function of pulse duration (PD: 1.3, 4.4, 8.2, and 11.6 micros; 2.8 MHz; 10-s exposure duration [ED]; 1-kHz pulse repetition frequency [PRF]). In this study, the roles of PRF and PD were evaluated at 5.9 MPa, the peak rarefactional pressure threshold near that of the ED50 estimate previously determined.
A 4 x 4 factorial design study (PRF: 50, 170, 500, and 1700 Hz; PD: 1.3, 4.4, 8.2, and 11.6 mus) was conducted (2.8 MHz; 10-s ED). Sprague Dawley rats (n = 175) were divided into 16 exposure groups (10 rats per group) and 1 sham group (15 rats); no lesions were produced in the sham group. Logistic regression analysis evaluated significance of effects for lesion occurrence, and Gaussian tobit analysis evaluated significance for lesion depth and surface area.
For lesion occurrence and sizes, the main effect of PRF was not significant. The interaction term, PRF x PD, was highly significant, indicating a strong positive dependence of lesion occurrence on the duty factor. The main effect of PD was almost significant (P = .052) and thus was included in the analysis model for a better fit.
Compared with the findings from a PRF x ED factorial study (J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:339-348), a function that considers PRF, PD, and ED might yield a sensitive indicator for consideration of a modified mechanical index, at least for the lung.
本研究旨在强化一项早期超声诱导肺出血研究(《超声医学与生物学》2003年;29:1625 - 1634)的结果,该研究将压力阈值估计为脉冲持续时间(PD:1.3、4.4、8.2和11.6微秒;2.8兆赫;10秒暴露持续时间[ED];1千赫脉冲重复频率[PRF])的函数。在本研究中,在5.9兆帕的压力下评估了PRF和PD的作用,该压力为先前确定的ED50估计值附近的峰值稀疏压力阈值。
进行了一项4×4析因设计研究(PRF:50、170、500和1700赫兹;PD:1.3、4.4、8.2和11.6微秒)(2.8兆赫;10秒ED)。将斯普拉格 - 道利大鼠(n = 175)分为16个暴露组(每组10只大鼠)和1个假手术组(15只大鼠);假手术组未产生损伤。逻辑回归分析评估损伤发生效应的显著性,高斯截尾分析评估损伤深度和表面积的显著性。
对于损伤的发生和大小,PRF的主效应不显著。交互项PRF×PD非常显著,表明损伤发生对占空因数有很强的正依赖性。PD的主效应几乎显著(P = 0.052),因此被纳入分析模型以获得更好的拟合。
与PRF×ED析因研究(《超声医学杂志》2005年;24:339 - 348)的结果相比,一个考虑PRF、PD和ED的函数可能会产生一个敏感指标,至少对于肺部而言,可用于考虑修正的机械指数。