基础研究与临床研究：公共投资组合中最合适的权重是多少？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Basic and clinical research: what is the most appropriate weighting in a public investment portfolio?

作者信息

Johnston S Claiborne, Hauser Stephen L

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 2006 Jul;60(1):9A-11A. doi: 10.1002/ana.20921.

DOI:10.1002/ana.20921

PMID:16802300

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Basic and clinical research: what is the most appropriate weighting in a public investment portfolio?

Ann Neurol. 2006 Jul;60(1):9A-11A. doi: 10.1002/ana.20921.

Clinical research and the NIH--a report card.

N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 6;349(19):1860-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb035066.

Liver disease research funding.

Hepatology. 2004 Feb;39(2):279. doi: 10.1002/hep.20079.

Growing pains for NIH grant review.

Cell. 2006 Jun 2;125(5):823-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.020.

A lost generation.

Cell. 2006 Jul 14;126(1):9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.022.

Public input benefits NIH.

Nat Med. 1999 Oct;5(10):1097. doi: 10.1038/13404.

A proposal to mobilize public opinion in support of the National Institutes of Health. Commentary.

Curr Opin Hematol. 1994 Jan;1(1):1-3.

Good news and bad news.

Physiologist. 2006 Aug;49(4):201, 203-5.

Windfall warning.

Nature. 2009 Oct 15;461(7266):847-8. doi: 10.1038/461847b.

Biomedical research: facing the opposition.

Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):17-9. doi: 10.1038/440017a.

引用本文的文献

Magnified Effects of Changes in NIH Research Funding Levels.

Serv Sci. 2012 Dec;4(4):382-395. doi: 10.1287/serv.1120.0030.

Estimating the NIH efficient frontier.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e34569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034569. Epub 2012 May 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Basic and clinical research: what is the most appropriate weighting in a public investment portfolio?

Ann Neurol. 2006 Jul;60(1):9A-11A. doi: 10.1002/ana.20921.

Clinical research and the NIH--a report card.

N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 6;349(19):1860-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb035066.

Liver disease research funding.

Hepatology. 2004 Feb;39(2):279. doi: 10.1002/hep.20079.

Growing pains for NIH grant review.

Cell. 2006 Jun 2;125(5):823-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.020.

A lost generation.

Cell. 2006 Jul 14;126(1):9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.022.

Public input benefits NIH.

Nat Med. 1999 Oct;5(10):1097. doi: 10.1038/13404.

A proposal to mobilize public opinion in support of the National Institutes of Health. Commentary.

Curr Opin Hematol. 1994 Jan;1(1):1-3.

Good news and bad news.

Physiologist. 2006 Aug;49(4):201, 203-5.

Windfall warning.

Nature. 2009 Oct 15;461(7266):847-8. doi: 10.1038/461847b.

Biomedical research: facing the opposition.

Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):17-9. doi: 10.1038/440017a.

引用本文的文献

Magnified Effects of Changes in NIH Research Funding Levels.

Serv Sci. 2012 Dec;4(4):382-395. doi: 10.1287/serv.1120.0030.

Estimating the NIH efficient frontier.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e34569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034569. Epub 2012 May 2.