Bergeron L René
Department of Social Work, University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA.
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2006;46(3-4):81-102. doi: 10.1300/J083v46n03_05.
This article explores the principle of self-determination as it relates to victims of elder abuse and neglect. Using newspaper accounts and cases from the author's practice and consulting files, various factors influencing the professional's interpretation of this principle are explored. The notion that self-determination allows victims of abuse and neglect to refuse intervention is challenged. The author concludes that the principle of self-determination and the notion of competency are overly simplified in the social work and elder abuse literature and may be misused by allowing abused older victims to choose to remain in often life-threatening situations. Special focus is given to Adult Protection Service worker, but the author asserts that protecting older people, assisting in creative interventions and developing needed services is a shared professional responsibility.
本文探讨了自决原则与虐待和忽视老年人受害者的关系。通过报纸报道以及作者实践和咨询档案中的案例,探讨了影响专业人员对这一原则解释的各种因素。自决原则允许虐待和忽视行为的受害者拒绝干预这一观念受到了挑战。作者得出结论,在社会工作和虐待老年人的文献中,自决原则和行为能力的概念被过度简化了,并且可能被滥用,因为它允许受虐待的老年受害者选择留在往往危及生命的处境中。本文特别关注了成人保护服务工作者,但作者断言,保护老年人、协助进行创造性干预以及开发所需服务是一项共同的专业责任。