Grellner Wolfgang, Madea Burkhard
Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 12, DE-24105 Kiel, Germany.
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.029. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
Research on vitality and wound age estimation belongs to the classic fields in forensic medicine. Despite large literature data there is still considerable demand of further research and practical transfer of knowledge and techniques to daily casework. Scientific studies must fulfil basic criteria as to appropriate methods, selection of case material, analysis of results and quality control. Nowadays, immunohistochemistry, biochemical tests and molecular biological techniques are mainly used studying questions of vitality and wound age. Investigations can be based on human tissue samples (autopsy material, vital specimens) or animal experiments. The possibilities, advantages and disadvantages of these study designs are described. Indispensable is the use of appropriate control groups or control samples and a sufficient case number which permits statistical analysis. Main strategy is to minimize variations due to methods and investigators as the unavoidable biological variation of vitality processes and wound repair is large enough.
关于活力和伤口年龄估计的研究属于法医学的经典领域。尽管有大量的文献数据,但仍有对进一步研究以及将知识和技术实际应用于日常案件工作的巨大需求。科学研究必须满足关于适当方法、案例材料选择、结果分析和质量控制的基本标准。如今,免疫组织化学、生化测试和分子生物学技术主要用于研究活力和伤口年龄问题。研究可以基于人体组织样本(尸检材料、活体标本)或动物实验。描述了这些研究设计的可能性、优点和缺点。使用适当的对照组或对照样本以及足够数量的案例以进行统计分析是必不可少的。主要策略是尽量减少由于方法和研究者导致的变异,因为活力过程和伤口修复不可避免的生物学变异已经足够大了。