J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):233-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-233.
Three rats and a pigeon were first trained on a two-component multiple schedule in which reinforcement in the two components occurred immediately after a response. Later, reinforcement in one component was delayed by a few seconds. During both stages of the experiment, reinforcement was scheduled by equal variable- (pigeon) or random-interval (rats) schedules in the two components. The main effect of the delayed reinforcement was to increase the rate of responding in the unchanged (non-delay) component. This behavioral contrast effect did not appear in all cases to be dependent upon a reduction in the rate of responding or the frequency of reinforcement in the delay component. This finding suggests that a reduction in response rate and/or reinforcement frequency in one component of a multiple schedule may not be a necessary prerequisite for the occurrence of behavioral contrast. This finding is, however, consistent with an explanation that suggests that behavioral contrast results from the introduction of a less-preferred condition in one component of a multiple schedule, since it is known that animals "prefer" immediate to delayed reinforcement.
三只老鼠和一只鸽子首先在一个由两个部分组成的多重时间表上进行训练,其中两个部分中的强化反应立即发生。后来,一个组件中的强化被延迟了几秒钟。在实验的两个阶段,两个组件中的强化都是通过均等的变量(鸽子)或随机间隔(老鼠)时间表来安排的。延迟强化的主要效果是增加未改变(非延迟)组件中的反应率。这种行为对比效应似乎并非总是取决于延迟组件中反应率或强化频率的降低。这一发现表明,在多重时间表的一个组成部分中降低反应率和/或强化频率可能不是行为对比发生的必要前提。然而,这一发现与一种解释是一致的,即行为对比是由于在多重时间表的一个组成部分中引入了一个不太受欢迎的条件,因为众所周知,动物更喜欢即时强化而不是延迟强化。