Jefferies Elizabeth, Lambon Ralph Matthew A
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Brain. 2006 Aug;129(Pt 8):2132-47. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl153. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
Different neuropsychological populations implicate diverse cortical regions in semantic memory: semantic dementia (SD) is characterized by atrophy of the anterior temporal lobes whilst poor comprehension in stroke aphasia is associated with prefrontal or temporal-parietal infarcts. This study employed a case-series design to compare SD and comprehension-impaired stroke aphasic patients directly on the same battery of semantic tests. Although the two groups obtained broadly equivalent scores, they showed qualitatively different semantic deficits. The SD group showed strong correlations between different semantic tasks--regardless of input/output modality--and substantial consistency when a set of items was assessed several times. They were also highly sensitive to frequency/familiarity and made coordinate and superordinate semantic errors in picture naming. These findings support the notion that amodal semantic representations degrade in SD. The stroke aphasia group also showed multimodal deficits and consistency across different input modalities, but inconsistent performance on tasks requiring different types of semantic processing. They were insensitive to familiarity/frequency--instead, tests of semantic association were influenced by the ease with which relevant semantic relationships could be identified and distractors rejected. In addition, the aphasic patients made associative semantic errors in picture naming that SD patients did not make. The aphasic patients' picture naming performance improved considerably with phonemic cues suggesting that these patients retained knowledge that could not be accessed without contextual support. We propose that semantic cognition is supported by two interacting principal components: (i) a set of amodal representations (which progressively degrade in SD) and (ii) executive processes that help to direct and control semantic activation in a task-appropriate fashion (which are dysfunctional in comprehension-impaired stroke aphasic patients).
语义性痴呆(SD)的特征是颞叶前部萎缩,而中风失语症患者的理解能力差与额叶前部或颞顶叶梗死有关。本研究采用病例系列设计,直接在同一组语义测试中比较SD患者和理解能力受损的中风失语症患者。尽管两组的得分大致相当,但他们表现出质的不同的语义缺陷。SD组在不同的语义任务之间表现出很强的相关性——无论输入/输出方式如何——并且当一组项目被多次评估时具有很高的一致性。他们对频率/熟悉度也非常敏感,并且在图片命名中会出现并列和上位语义错误。这些发现支持了非模态语义表征在SD中退化的观点。中风失语症组也表现出多模态缺陷以及不同输入方式之间的一致性,但在需要不同类型语义处理的任务上表现不一致。他们对熟悉度/频率不敏感——相反,语义联想测试受到识别相关语义关系和排除干扰项的难易程度的影响。此外,失语症患者在图片命名中会出现SD患者不会出现的联想语义错误。失语症患者的图片命名表现通过音素线索有了显著改善,这表明这些患者保留了在没有语境支持的情况下无法获取的知识。我们提出语义认知由两个相互作用的主要成分支持:(i)一组非模态表征(在SD中逐渐退化)和(ii)执行过程,这些过程有助于以任务适当的方式指导和控制语义激活(在理解能力受损的中风失语症患者中功能失调)。