Swahnberg Katarina, Wijma Barbro, Liss Per-Erik
Division of Gender and Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(7):830-6. doi: 10.1080/00016340500442613.
Earlier studies have shown a high prevalence of abuse in health care (AHC). We hypothesized that patients might easily feel abused when staff do not follow prevailing ethical principles. Therefore we developed the Violations of Ethical Principles Questionnaire (ViolEP), with 30 examples of situations in health care where four ethical principles are disobeyed (autonomy, nonmaleficence, justice, and integrity). Respondents reported whether or not they had ever experienced each of the situations, and whether or not they had perceived that event as a violation.
Our sample was 661 consecutive female patients at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, Sweden. They completed ViolEP and NorVold Abuse Questionnaire (NorAQ) at home and returned them by post.
20/661 (64%) women answered the ViolEP and 426/661 (64%) returned the NorAQ. The majority (73%) (306/420) had experienced staff disobeying ethical principles. More than every second woman had perceived those events as violations (68%) (209/306). The prevalence of AHC was 23%. ViolEP had good sensitivity but low specificity when we used AHC according to NorAQ as the "gold standard".
The majority of the patients had experienced health care staff disobeying prevailing ethical principles. These events were not always perceived as violations. The reason for this discrepancy needs to be explored.
早期研究表明医疗保健中的虐待行为(AHC)发生率很高。我们推测,当工作人员不遵循现行道德原则时,患者可能很容易感到受到了虐待。因此,我们编制了违反道德原则问卷(ViolEP),其中包含30个医疗保健中违反四项道德原则(自主、不伤害、公正和诚信)的情况示例。受访者报告他们是否曾经历过每种情况,以及他们是否将该事件视为一种违规行为。
我们的样本是瑞典林雪平妇产科连续收治的661名女性患者。她们在家中完成了ViolEP和诺沃尔德虐待问卷(NorAQ),并通过邮寄方式返还。
20/661(64%)的女性回答了ViolEP,426/661(64%)返还了NorAQ。大多数(73%)(306/420)曾经历过工作人员违反道德原则的情况。超过半数的女性将这些事件视为违规行为(68%)(209/306)。医疗保健虐待的发生率为23%。当我们将根据NorAQ定义的医疗保健虐待作为“金标准”时,ViolEP具有良好的敏感性但特异性较低。
大多数患者曾经历过医疗保健工作人员违反现行道德原则的情况。这些事件并不总是被视为违规行为。这种差异的原因需要进一步探讨。