Olivecrona Charlotta, Tidermark Jan, Hamberg Per, Ponzer Sari, Cederfjäll Claes
Department of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet. Huddinge, Sweden.
Acta Orthop. 2006 Jun;77(3):519-23. doi: 10.1080/17453670610012539.
The use of a pneumatic tourniquet to obtain a bloodless field during a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) allows the surgeon to work with greater technical precision in a safe, clear environment. Despite the benefits of surgical tourniquets and many advances in tourniquet equipment, their use is not without risk and complications may still occur. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether there are any differences between an elastic stockinette, cast padding, and no protective material at all regarding skin injuries after a primary TKA in a bloodless field using a pneumatic tourniquet.
92 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups. In the first group, the limb underneath the pneumatic tourniquet was protected by a two-layer elastic stockinette (E). In the second group, it was protected by cast padding (C), and no protective material (N) was used in the third group. The presence of major skin injuries (blisters) was recorded when the tourniquet was removed after surgery.
The two groups with skin protection had fewer skin injuries (p = 0.007). The elastic stockinette was significantly better than having no protective material and there was a trend towards better results in the elastic stockinette group than in the cast padding group.
Our findings indicate that protective material underneath the tourniquet cuff reduces the risk of skin injuries, i.e. blisters. An elastic stockinette appears to be best.
在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中使用气动止血带以获得无血手术视野,可使外科医生在安全、清晰的环境中更精确地操作。尽管手术止血带具有诸多益处,且止血带设备也有了许多改进,但其使用并非毫无风险,并发症仍可能发生。本研究的主要目的是确定在使用气动止血带的无血手术视野下进行初次全膝关节置换术后,弹性弹力袜、石膏衬垫与不使用任何保护材料相比,在皮肤损伤方面是否存在差异。
92例患者被随机分为3组中的1组。第一组,气动止血带下方的肢体用双层弹性弹力袜(E组)保护;第二组,用石膏衬垫(C组)保护;第三组不使用任何保护材料(N组)。术后拆除止血带时记录是否存在严重皮肤损伤(水泡)。
使用皮肤保护措施的两组皮肤损伤较少(p = 0.007)。弹性弹力袜组明显优于不使用保护材料组,且弹性弹力袜组的效果有优于石膏衬垫组的趋势。
我们的研究结果表明,止血带袖带下方的保护材料可降低皮肤损伤(即水泡)的风险。弹性弹力袜似乎是最佳选择。