Ulrich G
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Eschenallee 3, 14050 Berlin.
Nervenarzt. 2006 Nov;77(11):1287-8, 1290, 1292 passim. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2099-6.
Currently a comprehensive discipline, neurobiology is the field of examining the essence of mind in contrast to psychophysiology. It is becoming more and more apparent that this aim cannot be satisfied. Neurobiology is hampered by its deeply rooted paradigm of mechanistic materialism. Thus we learn about yet unsolved "hard problems." In order to recognize them as pseudoproblems, we must avoid unprovable metaphysical assumptions such as e.g., treating matter and mind as components of one organism rather than complementary but logically incommensurable means of description. To our physicalistically oriented university psychiatry, reintroducing the subject is of primary importance. At first glance, this would confront us again with unsolvable problems supposedly avoided by the psychiatric 'brain technicians' preferring object-oriented study (neuromaging, receptors). One such question is the 'fact' adverse to physical law of psychophysical interactions: it does not actually represent an insoluble hard problem but is a typical pseudoproblem resulting from false premises.
神经生物学目前是一门综合学科,它是与心理生理学相对照来研究心智本质的领域。越来越明显的是,这一目标无法实现。神经生物学受到其根深蒂固的机械唯物主义范式的阻碍。因此,我们了解到了尚未解决的“难题”。为了将它们识别为伪问题,我们必须避免不可证明的形而上学假设,比如将物质和心智视为一个有机体的组成部分,而不是互补但在逻辑上不可通约的描述方式。对于我们以物理主义为导向的大学精神病学来说,重新引入主体至关重要。乍一看,这会让我们再次面对那些据说是被倾向于面向对象研究(神经成像、受体)的精神病学“大脑技术人员”所回避的无法解决的问题。其中一个问题是心理物理相互作用违背物理定律的“事实”:它实际上并不代表一个无法解决的难题,而是一个由错误前提导致的典型伪问题。