• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来曲唑用于早期乳腺癌女性延长辅助治疗的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of letrozole in the extended adjuvant treatment of women with early breast cancer.

作者信息

El Ouagari Khalid, Karnon Jon, Delea Thomas, Talbot Willena, Brandman Jane

机构信息

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., 385 boul. Bouchard, H9S 1A9, Dorval, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Jan;101(1):37-49. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9262-4. Epub 2006 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-006-9262-4
PMID:16821085
Abstract

Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for 5 years reduces recurrence in hormone receptor positive, post-menopausal women with early breast cancer, but offers no advantage when prolonged to another 5 years, during which the risk of recurrence remains high. Treating patients, who remain disease-free after 5 years of tamoxifen, with letrozole significantly reduces recurrence, regardless of nodal status. This study evaluated the life-time cost-utility of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy in 62-year-old patients from a third-party payer perspective. A Markov model incorporated locoregional, contralateral, and metastatic recurrences. The comparator was placebo. Event rates were based on published trials. Utility values were taken from a clinical trial and published literature. Costs were obtained from published literature, provincial payment schedules, cancer agencies, and drug plans formularies. Resource use reflected Canadian treatment patterns. Robustness of the model was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Extended adjuvant letrozole therapy of a cohort consisting of 50% node-negative and 50% node-positive patients prolonged their lives on average by 0.466 years or 0.267 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an additional cost of Can$8,031 per patient, yielding an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of $34,058 per QALY. Letrozole was more cost-effective in node-positive than in node-negative patients (Can$26,553 vs Can$46,049 per QALY). Results were robust to variations in age, healthcare costs, and utilities. The degree of confidence that the cost per QALY would be below Can$50,000 reached 100% for node-positive and 77% for node-negative patients. Extended adjuvant letrozole is cost-effective in both node-negative and node-positive patients having ICURs below Can$50,000/QALY.

摘要

辅助他莫昔芬治疗5年可降低激素受体阳性的绝经后早期乳腺癌女性的复发率,但延长至另外5年并无益处,在此期间复发风险仍然很高。对于他莫昔芬治疗5年后仍无疾病的患者,使用来曲唑治疗可显著降低复发率,无论淋巴结状态如何。本研究从第三方支付者的角度评估了62岁患者延长辅助来曲唑治疗的终身成本效益。一个马尔可夫模型纳入了局部区域、对侧和远处转移复发情况。对照为安慰剂。事件发生率基于已发表的试验。效用值取自一项临床试验和已发表的文献。成本来自已发表的文献、省级支付计划、癌症机构和药品计划处方集。资源使用反映了加拿大的治疗模式。使用确定性和概率敏感性分析测试模型的稳健性。由50%淋巴结阴性和50%淋巴结阳性患者组成的队列进行延长辅助来曲唑治疗,平均可延长寿命0.466年或0.267个质量调整生命年(QALY),每位患者额外花费8031加元,增量成本效益比(ICUR)为每QALY 34058加元。来曲唑在淋巴结阳性患者中比在淋巴结阴性患者中更具成本效益(每QALY分别为26553加元和46049加元)。结果对年龄、医疗成本和效用的变化具有稳健性。对于淋巴结阳性患者,每QALY成本低于50000加元的置信度达到100%,对于淋巴结阴性患者为77%。延长辅助来曲唑治疗在淋巴结阴性和淋巴结阳性患者中均具有成本效益,ICUR均低于50000加元/QALY。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of letrozole in the extended adjuvant treatment of women with early breast cancer.来曲唑用于早期乳腺癌女性延长辅助治疗的成本效益
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Jan;101(1):37-49. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9262-4. Epub 2006 Jul 4.
2
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.他莫昔芬辅助治疗5年后,来曲唑延长辅助治疗对绝经后早期乳腺癌女性的成本效益分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Jul;12(7):374-86.
3
Cost-effectiveness of letrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive early breast cancer from a Canadian perspective.从加拿大的角度看,来曲唑与他莫昔芬作为激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌绝经后女性初始辅助治疗的成本效益
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Apr;108(3):375-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9607-7. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
4
Cost-effectiveness of letrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.来曲唑与他莫昔芬作为激素受体阳性绝经后早期乳腺癌女性初始辅助治疗的成本效益分析
Clin Breast Cancer. 2007 Jun;7(8):608-18. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2007.n.018.
5
Cost utility and budget impact of third-generation aromatase inhibitors for advanced breast cancer: a literature-based model analysis of costs in the Italian National Health Service.第三代芳香化酶抑制剂用于晚期乳腺癌的成本效用和预算影响:基于意大利国家医疗服务体系成本的文献模型分析
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1546-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.014.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole versus tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer - a health-economic analysis based on the 100-month analysis of the ATAC trial and the German health system.阿那曲唑与他莫昔芬用于早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的成本效益分析——基于阿那曲唑、他莫昔芬单独或联用治疗(ATAC)试验100个月分析及德国医疗体系的卫生经济学分析
Onkologie. 2010;33(4):155-66. doi: 10.1159/000286233. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
7
Preventing relapse beyond 5 years: the MA.17 extended adjuvant trial.预防5年以上复发:MA.17延长辅助治疗试验
Semin Oncol. 2006 Apr;33(2 Suppl 7):S8-12. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.03.025.
8
Benefit and projected cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.阿那曲唑与他莫昔芬作为早期雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者初始辅助治疗的获益及预期成本效益
Cancer. 2004 Sep 15;101(6):1311-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20492.
9
Cost utility analysis of first-line hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer: comparison of two aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen.晚期乳腺癌一线激素治疗的成本效用分析:两种芳香化酶抑制剂与他莫昔芬的比较。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun;26(3):289-96. doi: 10.1097/01.COC.0000021042.55557.2B.
10
Cost-effectiveness of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy in treating postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer in Japan.在日本,来曲唑与他莫昔芬作为一线激素疗法治疗绝经后晚期乳腺癌女性的成本效益。
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005 Mar;32(3):351-63.

引用本文的文献

1
The value-for-money of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: time to put the debate to rest?辅助性芳香化酶抑制剂的性价比:是时候结束这场争论了吗?
Curr Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(2):77-9. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2579.
2
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of breast cancer.乳腺癌治疗中的药物经济学考量
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;2:47-61. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
3
Letrozole: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer.来曲唑:用于治疗激素反应性早期乳腺癌绝经后妇女的综述。
Drugs. 2009 Aug 20;69(12):1681-705. doi: 10.2165/10482340-000000000-00000.
4
Methodological issues in evaluating cost effectiveness of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer: a need for improved modelling to aid decision making.早期乳腺癌辅助性芳香化酶抑制剂成本效益评估中的方法学问题:需要改进建模以辅助决策
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(5):409-23. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826050-00005.
5
Increasing protection after tamoxifen: insights from the extended adjuvant aromatase inhibitor trials.他莫昔芬治疗后强化辅助治疗:来自延长辅助芳香化酶抑制剂试验的见解
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan;134(1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0324-8. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
6
Continuing with letrozole offers greater benefits.继续使用来曲唑可带来更大益处。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul;133(7):445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00432-006-0185-6. Epub 2007 Jan 17.