Buchman Craig A, Roush Patricia A, Teagle Holly F B, Brown Carolyn J, Zdanski Carlton J, Grose John H
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Ear Hear. 2006 Aug;27(4):399-408. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000224100.30525.ab.
To describe a group of children exhibiting electrophysiologic responses characteristic of auditory neuropathy (AN) who were subsequently identified as having absent or small cochlear nerves (i.e., cochlear nerve deficiency).
A retrospective review of the clinical records, audiological testing results, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Fifty-one of 65 children with AN characteristics on auditory brain stem response (ABR) testing had MRI available for review. Nine (18%) of these 51 children with ABR characteristic of AN have been identified as having small (N = 2; 4%) or absent (N = 7; 14%) cochlear nerves on MRI.
Of the nine children with cochlear nerve deficiency, five (56%) were affected unilaterally and four (44%) bilaterally. Eight of nine presented after failing a newborn infant hearing screening, whereas one presented at 3 yr of age. On diagnostic ABR testing, all 9 children (9 of 13 affected ears; 69%) had evidence of a cochlear microphonic (CM) and absent neural responses in at least one ear. In the unilateral cases, AN characteristics were detected in all affected ears. In bilateral cases, at least one of the ears in each child demonstrated the AN phenotype, whereas the contralateral ear had no CM identified. Only one ear with cochlear nerve deficiency had present otoacoustic emissions as measured by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. In children with appropriate available behavioral testing results, all ears without cochlear nerves were identified as having a profound hearing loss. Only 4 (31%) of the 13 ears with cochlear nerve deficiency had a small internal auditory canal on MRI.
Children with cochlear nerve deficiency can present with electrophysiologic evidence of AN. These children frequently refer on newborn screening examinations that use ABR-based testing methods. Similar to other causes of AN, diagnostic ABR testing will show a CM with absent neural responses. Given that 9 (18%) of 51 children with available MRI and electrophysiologic characteristics of AN in our program have been identified as having cochlear nerve deficiency makes this a relatively common diagnosis. These findings suggest that MRI is indicated for all children diagnosed with AN. Moreover, electrophysiologic evidence of unilateral AN in association with a profound hearing loss should make the clinician highly suspicious for this problem. Although children with cochlear nerve deficiency who have a small nerve may benefit from cochlear implantation or amplification, these interventions are obviously contraindicated in children with completely absent cochlear nerves.
描述一组表现出听觉神经病(AN)电生理反应特征的儿童,这些儿童随后被确定为耳蜗神经缺如或细小(即耳蜗神经发育不全)。
对临床记录、听力学测试结果和磁共振成像(MRI)研究进行回顾性分析。65例听觉脑干反应(ABR)测试具有AN特征的儿童中,51例有MRI可供分析。这51例具有ABR特征的AN儿童中,9例(18%)经MRI确定为耳蜗神经细小(n = 2;4%)或缺如(n = 7;14%)。
9例耳蜗神经发育不全的儿童中,5例(56%)为单侧受累,4例(44%)为双侧受累。9例中有8例在新生儿听力筛查未通过后就诊,1例在3岁时就诊。在诊断性ABR测试中,所有9例儿童(13只受累耳中的9只;69%)至少有一只耳存在耳蜗微音电位(CM)而神经反应消失。单侧病例中,所有受累耳均检测到AN特征。双侧病例中,每个儿童至少有一只耳表现出AN表型,而对侧耳未检测到CM。在耳蜗神经发育不全的儿童中,仅1只耳通过畸变产物耳声发射检测到耳声发射。在有合适行为测试结果的儿童中,所有无耳蜗神经的耳均被确定为极重度听力损失。13只耳蜗神经发育不全的耳中,仅4只(31%)在MRI上显示内耳道细小。
耳蜗神经发育不全的儿童可表现出AN的电生理证据。这些儿童在使用基于ABR的测试方法的新生儿筛查中常被转诊。与AN的其他病因相似,诊断性ABR测试将显示CM存在而神经反应消失。鉴于在我们的研究中,51例具有MRI和电生理特征的AN儿童中有9例(18%)被确定为耳蜗神经发育不全,这是一个相对常见的诊断。这些发现表明,所有诊断为AN的儿童均应进行MRI检查。此外,单侧AN的电生理证据伴极重度听力损失应使临床医生高度怀疑此问题。虽然耳蜗神经细小的耳蜗神经发育不全儿童可能从人工耳蜗植入或放大中获益,但这些干预措施显然不适用于耳蜗神经完全缺如的儿童。