Gmür J, Burger J, Schanz U, Fehr J, Schaffner A
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Zürich, Switzerland.
Lancet. 1991 Nov 16;338(8777):1223-6. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92098-m.
Early studies suggested that the risk of haemorrhagic complications become unacceptable when platelet counts drop below 20 x 10(9)/l. Because there are insufficient data to define 20 x 10(9)/l as the threshold for prophylactic platelet transfusions, the practicability of a more restrictive transfusion policy has been assessed prospectively in 102 consecutive patients being treated for acute leukaemia. Besides platelet count, the transfusion protocol took into consideration factors such as presence of bleeding, fever, coagulation disorders, and intention to do therapeutic procedures. 31 major bleeding episodes occurred on 1.9% of the study days when platelet counts were 10 x 10(9)/l or less and on 0.07% of study days when counts were 10-20 x 10(9)/l. The findings indicate that the threshold for prophylactic transfusions can safely be set at 5 x 10(9)/l in patients without fever or bleeding manifestations and at 10 x 10(9)/l in patients with such signs. For patients with coagulation disorders or anatomical lesions, or for those on heparin, the threshold should be at least 20 x 10(9)/l. Such a restrictive platelet transfusion policy, which is applicable not only to thrombocytopenia associated with acute leukaemia but also to other forms of hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia, reduces exposure of such patients to blood donors and results in substantial health-care savings.
早期研究表明,当血小板计数降至20×10⁹/L以下时,出血并发症的风险变得难以接受。由于缺乏足够的数据将20×10⁹/L定义为预防性血小板输注的阈值,因此对102例连续接受急性白血病治疗的患者前瞻性评估了更严格输血策略的实用性。除血小板计数外,输血方案还考虑了出血、发热、凝血障碍以及进行治疗性操作的意图等因素。在血小板计数为10×10⁹/L或更低时,31次主要出血事件发生在1.9%的研究日;在计数为10 - 20×10⁹/L时,发生在0.07%的研究日。研究结果表明,对于无发热或出血表现的患者,预防性输血阈值可安全设定为5×10⁹/L;对于有此类体征的患者,阈值为10×10⁹/L。对于有凝血障碍或解剖学病变的患者,或正在使用肝素的患者,阈值应至少为20×10⁹/L。这种严格的血小板输血策略不仅适用于与急性白血病相关的血小板减少症,也适用于其他形式的增殖性血小板减少症,减少了此类患者接触献血者的机会,并节省了大量医疗保健费用。