Fernández-Villar Alberto, González Ana, Leiro Virginia, Represas Cristina, Botana María Isabel, Blanco Purificación, Mosteiro Mar, Piñeiro Luis
Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Xeral-Cíes, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Pontevedra, España.
Arch Bronconeumol. 2006 Jun;42(6):278-82. doi: 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60143-2.
Aspiration of bronchial wash fluid is commonly used in conjunction with brushing and forceps biopsy to diagnose endoscopically visible lung cancer. However, the optimal sequence of these procedures is subject to debate. The objective of this study was to determine if the order in which bronchial washing is performed relative to bronchial brushing and forceps biopsy has any effect on the diagnostic yield.
A prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on patients with endoscopically visible lung cancer who underwent video-assisted fiberoptic bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes. Aspiration of bronchial wash fluid was performed on all patients both before and after bronchial brushing and forceps biopsy. The results were analyzed separately for each type of endobronchial lesion and for both together.
The study included 75 patients, with a mean age of 63.3 years; 81% were men. Bronchoscopy was diagnostic in 71 (94.7%) cases. Findings from bronchial washing fluid were positive in 40 (53.3%) patients when washing was performed prior to brushing and forceps biopsy; when washing was performed after these procedures, findings were positive in 43 (57.3%) patients (P=.6). The combined diagnostic yield of washing before and after brushing and forceps biopsy was 69.3%, a significantly better result than either washing before (P=.001) or after (P=.004) the other sampling techniques. In cases where findings from washing done after brushing and forceps biopsy were negative (14 of 32, 43.7%), blood in the aspirated sample interfered with cytology. In comparison, when washing was performed prior to brushing and biopsy, that problem arose in only 3 of the 35 cases (8.5%) (P=.002).
The order in which bronchial washing is performed in relation to other sampling techniques for diagnosing bronchial tumors does not influence the diagnostic yield. This is probably because the aspirated fluid sample is more likely to contain excessive blood when washing is performed after brushing and forceps biopsy. However, the diagnostic yield can be significantly increased by combining the findings from bronchial washings performed both before and after other sample collection procedures.
支气管冲洗液抽吸通常与刷检和钳取活检联合使用,以诊断内镜可见的肺癌。然而,这些操作的最佳顺序仍存在争议。本研究的目的是确定支气管冲洗相对于支气管刷检和钳取活检的执行顺序是否对诊断率有任何影响。
对因诊断目的接受视频辅助纤维支气管镜检查的内镜可见肺癌患者进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。在所有患者的支气管刷检和钳取活检前后均进行支气管冲洗液抽吸。对每种类型的支气管内病变以及两者合并的结果分别进行分析。
该研究纳入了75例患者,平均年龄63.3岁;81%为男性。支气管镜检查在71例(94.7%)病例中具有诊断价值。当在刷检和钳取活检之前进行冲洗时,支气管冲洗液检查结果在40例(53.3%)患者中呈阳性;当在这些操作之后进行冲洗时,43例(57.3%)患者的检查结果呈阳性(P = 0.6)。刷检和钳取活检前后冲洗的联合诊断率为69.3%,显著优于在其他采样技术之前(P = 0.001)或之后(P = 0.004)进行冲洗的诊断率。在刷检和钳取活检后冲洗结果为阴性的病例中(32例中的14例,43.7%),抽吸样本中的血液干扰了细胞学检查。相比之下,当在刷检和活检之前进行冲洗时,35例病例中只有3例(8.5%)出现该问题(P = 0.002)。
支气管冲洗相对于其他诊断支气管肿瘤的采样技术的执行顺序不会影响诊断率。这可能是因为在刷检和钳取活检之后进行冲洗时,抽吸的液体样本更有可能含有过多血液。然而,通过合并在其他样本采集程序前后进行的支气管冲洗结果,可以显著提高诊断率。