Balasubramanian S P, Reed M W
Academic Surgical Oncology Unit, University of Sheffield, K Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom.
Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(6):1317-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.04.066. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
Angiogenesis is a key pathway crucial to the patho-physiology of both vascular disease and solid cancer. In physiological conditions, a fine balance of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors is maintained as part of normal homeostatic mechanisms. It is widely accepted that excess angiogenesis influences the development or progression of tumours whilst insufficient angiogenesis may predispose to ischemic vascular disease. Although there are some factors, which predispose to both cancers and vascular disease, we believe there is a reasonable body of literature that suggests an inverse association between the two. We hypothesise that pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic phenotypes exist in the population. This may be due to a combination of underlying genetic variations and/or environmental factors. Pro-angiogenic phenotypes would have increased susceptibility to solid cancers and decreased predisposition to cardiovascular diseases and vice versa with the anti-angiogenic phenotypes. We propose that genetic and environmental factors causing a shift in the balance of angiogenesis will predispose individuals towards one group of pathologies while protecting them from another. Evaluation of this hypothesis will in the first instance involve carefully designed large population based observational studies to determine if an inverse relationship exists between the predisposition to ischemic vascular disease and the predisposition to solid cancer. Further detailed study of the pathways and underlying mechanisms of angiogenesis especially in disease states would facilitate better understanding of its regulation. Evaluation and validation of molecular markers that affect the 'angiogenesis pathway' may be helpful in determining the angiogenic potential of individual subjects. Determining where individuals lie along this spectrum may have a potential role in the prediction and stratification of risk of cancer and vascular disease. Modifying risk for patients at high risk of disease at the two opposing ends of the spectrum may then be possible by either lifestyle or dietary alterations or drugs targeting the angiogenic pathway.
血管生成是对血管疾病和实体癌的病理生理学至关重要的关键途径。在生理条件下,作为正常稳态机制的一部分,促血管生成和抗血管生成因子保持着精细的平衡。人们普遍认为,血管生成过多会影响肿瘤的发生或进展,而血管生成不足可能易引发缺血性血管疾病。尽管存在一些既易引发癌症又易引发血管疾病的因素,但我们认为有相当数量的文献表明两者之间存在负相关。我们假设人群中存在促血管生成和抗血管生成表型。这可能是潜在基因变异和/或环境因素共同作用的结果。促血管生成表型会增加患实体癌的易感性,降低患心血管疾病的倾向,反之,抗血管生成表型则相反。我们提出,导致血管生成平衡发生变化的遗传和环境因素会使个体易患一组疾病,同时保护他们免受另一组疾病的侵害。对这一假设的评估首先将涉及精心设计的基于大量人群的观察性研究,以确定缺血性血管疾病易感性与实体癌易感性之间是否存在负相关关系。进一步详细研究血管生成的途径和潜在机制,尤其是在疾病状态下,将有助于更好地理解其调控机制。评估和验证影响“血管生成途径”的分子标志物可能有助于确定个体受试者的血管生成潜力。确定个体在这一范围内的位置可能在预测和分层癌症及血管疾病风险方面具有潜在作用。然后,通过生活方式或饮食改变或靶向血管生成途径的药物,有可能改变处于这一范围两端高疾病风险患者的风险。