Carter John A
Department of Anaesthesia, Frenchay Hospital, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16, UK.
Respir Care Clin N Am. 2006 Jun;12(2):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.rcc.2006.03.008.
The cheap manufacture of plastics compared with the relatively expensive labor-intensive cost of decontaminating medical equipment encourages the use of disposable single-use equipment. Although the manufacture and disposal of single-use equipment superficially would seem to have more environmental impact than reusable equipment, the processes of cleaning and decontaminating reusable items may impose an even greater cost on the environment. In a recent study at two United States hospitals, anesthetic tubing accounted for less than 10% of medical waste, about half the amount of the plastic waste generated by the cafeterias at the same two hospitals [34]. There may be a higher cost to the organization by using single-use breathing systems. One United States institution has estimated that changing from single-use to re-usable breathing systems, with a new filter for each patient, resulted in savings in initial cost and waste disposal of more than Dollars 100,000 per year [20]. In the light of current knowledge concerning infective agents, reusing breathing systems for up to 1 week with a new appropriate filter for each new patient seems to be safe practice, provided the manufacturer of the breathing system recommends such use, and the breathing system is carefully checked before each new patient.
与相对昂贵的医疗设备去污劳动密集型成本相比,塑料的廉价制造促使人们使用一次性即用型设备。虽然一次性设备的制造和处置表面上似乎比可重复使用的设备对环境的影响更大,但清洁和净化可重复使用物品的过程可能会给环境带来更大的成本。在美国两家医院最近的一项研究中,麻醉管占医疗废物的比例不到10%,约为同两家医院食堂产生的塑料废物量的一半[34]。使用一次性呼吸设备可能会给机构带来更高的成本。美国一家机构估计,从一次性呼吸设备改为可重复使用的呼吸设备,并为每位患者配备新的过滤器,每年可节省超过10万美元的初始成本和废物处理费用[20]。根据目前关于感染源的知识,在为每位新患者配备新的合适过滤器的情况下,将呼吸设备重复使用长达1周似乎是安全的做法,前提是呼吸设备制造商推荐这种使用方式,并且在为每位新患者使用前对呼吸设备进行仔细检查。