Suppr超能文献

纺锤菌素和4,6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚与A2T2 DNA发夹的结合:生物物理技术比较

Binding of netropsin and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to an A2T2 DNA hairpin: a comparison of biophysical techniques.

作者信息

Freyer Matthew W, Buscaglia Robert, Nguyen Binh, Wilson W David, Lewis Edwin A

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

出版信息

Anal Biochem. 2006 Aug 15;355(2):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.049. Epub 2006 May 30.

Abstract

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and biosensor-surface plasmon resonance (SPR) are evaluated for their accuracy in determining equilibrium constants, ease of use, and range of application. Systems chosen for comparison of the three techniques were the formation of complexes between two minor groove binding compounds, netropsin and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and a DNA hairpin having the sequence 5'-d(CGAATTCGTCTCCGAATTCG)-3'. These systems were chosen for their structural differences, simplicity (1:1 binding), and binding affinity in the range of interest (K approximately 10(8) M(-1)). The binding affinities determined from all three techniques were in excellent agreement; for example, netropsin/DNA formation constants were determined to be K = 1.7x10(8) M(-1) (ITC), K = 2.4x10(8) M(-1) (DSC), and K = 2.9x10(8) M(-1) (SPR). DSC and SPR techniques have an advantage over ITC in studies of ligands that bind with affinities greater than 10(8) M(-1). The ITC technique has the advantage of determining a full set of thermodynamic parameters, including deltaH, TdeltaS, and deltaC(p) in addition to deltaG (or K). The ITC data revealed complex binding behavior in these minor groove binding systems not detected in the other methods. All three techniques provide accurate estimates of binding affinity, and each has unique benefits for drug binding studies.

摘要

对等温滴定量热法(ITC)、差示扫描量热法(DSC)和生物传感器表面等离子体共振(SPR)在测定平衡常数方面的准确性、易用性和应用范围进行了评估。为比较这三种技术而选择的体系是两种小沟结合化合物(纺锤菌素和4,6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚(DAPI))与具有5'-d(CGAATTCGTCTCCGAATTCG)-3'序列的DNA发夹形成复合物。选择这些体系是因为它们的结构差异、简单性(1:1结合)以及在感兴趣的范围内的结合亲和力(K约为10⁸ M⁻¹)。通过所有三种技术测定的结合亲和力结果非常一致;例如,纺锤菌素/DNA形成常数经测定为K = 1.7×10⁸ M⁻¹(ITC)、K = 2.4×10⁸ M⁻¹(DSC)和K = 2.9×10⁸ M⁻¹(SPR)。在研究亲和力大于10⁸ M⁻¹的配体时,DSC和SPR技术比ITC具有优势。ITC技术的优势在于除了能测定ΔG(或K)外,还能测定一整套热力学参数,包括ΔH、TΔS和ΔC(p)。ITC数据揭示了这些小沟结合体系中存在其他方法未检测到的复杂结合行为。所有这三种技术都能准确估算结合亲和力,并且每种技术在药物结合研究中都有独特的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验