Keranen Lisa
University of Colorado, 270 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0270, USA.
Account Res. 2006 Apr-Jun;13(2):179-205. doi: 10.1080/08989620500440261.
Federal and institutional policies recommend the criterion of "seriousness" as a guide for sanction assignment in cases where researchers have been found to have committed research misconduct. Discrepancies in assessments of seriousness for similar acts of misconduct suggest the need to clarify what might be meant by the seriousness of research misconduct and how the criterion can be used to assign sanctions. This essay demonstrates how determinations of seriousness can differ depending on the set of ethical appeals employed and argues that an expanded lexicon for talking about the seriousness of research misconduct would help to promote fairness and consistency in sanction assignment. It concludes with some policy recommendations for those charged with research misconduct sanction assignment and for those who oversee research integrity at institutional levels.
联邦政策和机构政策建议,在发现研究人员存在研究不当行为的情况下,将“严重性”标准作为处罚判定的指导原则。对于类似的不当行为,在严重性评估上存在差异,这表明有必要明确研究不当行为的严重性可能意味着什么,以及该标准如何用于判定处罚。本文展示了根据所采用的一系列道德诉求,严重性判定可能会有所不同,并认为扩充用于讨论研究不当行为严重性的词汇,将有助于在处罚判定中促进公平性和一致性。文章最后为负责研究不当行为处罚判定的人员以及在机构层面监督研究诚信的人员提出了一些政策建议。