Arenas E, Alberch J, Marsal J
Departament de Biologia Cellular i Anatomia Patològica, Hospital de Bellvitge, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Neuroscience. 1991;42(3):707-14. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90039-q.
In order to study the role of the dopaminergic system in the mu- or delta-opioid inhibition of endogenous acetylcholine release evoked by glutamate, we blocked the dopaminergic transmission with dopaminergic antagonists and/or 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. In all these experimental conditions we show that dopaminergic antagonists by themselves could not modify the glutamate-evoked acetylcholine release, and the selective D1 antagonist (SCH 23390) was unable to modify the mu- or delta-opioid inhibition of glutamate-evoked acetylcholine release. However, in the non-lesioned animals and in the contralateral striata to 6-hydroxydopamine lesions, D2 antagonists (haloperidol or sulpiride, 10 microM) prevented the effects of delta-opiate agonists ([D-Ala2, D-Leu5]enkephalin, 1 microM and [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin, 0.1 microM), but not the effects of mu-opiate agonists (morphine or [D-Ala2, Gly(ol)5]enkephalin, 1 microM). Furthermore, [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]enkephalin inhibition of glutamate-evoked acetylcholine release was prevented by D2 antagonists in a concentration-dependent manner. Instead, in the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned side, while [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]enkephalin (1 microM) inhibition of glutamate-evoked acetylcholine release was completely abolished, morphine (1 microM) inhibition remained unchanged. We conclude that the inhibition of glutamate-evoked endogenous acetylcholine release by delta-opiate agonists, unlike mu-opiate agonists, depends on dopaminergic terminals and D2 receptors. Furthermore, these results suggest that the inhibition by delta-opiate agonists could be the result of dopamine release from dopaminergic terminals and its action on D2 receptors.
为了研究多巴胺能系统在μ-或δ-阿片类物质对谷氨酸诱发的内源性乙酰胆碱释放的抑制作用中的作用,我们用多巴胺能拮抗剂和/或6-羟基多巴胺损伤来阻断多巴胺能传递。在所有这些实验条件下,我们发现多巴胺能拮抗剂自身不能改变谷氨酸诱发的乙酰胆碱释放,并且选择性D1拮抗剂(SCH 23390)不能改变μ-或δ-阿片类物质对谷氨酸诱发的乙酰胆碱释放的抑制作用。然而,在未损伤的动物以及6-羟基多巴胺损伤对侧的纹状体中,D2拮抗剂(氟哌啶醇或舒必利,10微摩尔)可阻断δ-阿片类激动剂([D-丙氨酸2,D-亮氨酸5]脑啡肽,1微摩尔和[D-青霉胺2,D-青霉胺5]脑啡肽,0.1微摩尔)的作用,但不能阻断μ-阿片类激动剂(吗啡或[D-丙氨酸2,甘氨酸(醇)5]脑啡肽,1微摩尔)的作用。此外,D2拮抗剂以浓度依赖性方式阻断了[D-丙氨酸2,D-亮氨酸5]脑啡肽对谷氨酸诱发的乙酰胆碱释放的抑制作用。相反,在6-羟基多巴胺损伤侧,虽然[D-丙氨酸2,D-亮氨酸5]脑啡肽(1微摩尔)对谷氨酸诱发的乙酰胆碱释放的抑制作用完全消失,但吗啡(1微摩尔)的抑制作用保持不变。我们得出结论,与μ-阿片类激动剂不同,δ-阿片类激动剂对谷氨酸诱发的内源性乙酰胆碱释放的抑制作用依赖于多巴胺能终末和D2受体。此外,这些结果表明,δ-阿片类激动剂的抑制作用可能是多巴胺从多巴胺能终末释放并作用于D2受体的结果。