Suppr超能文献

罗非昔布12.5毫克、罗非昔布25毫克和塞来昔布200毫克治疗症状性骨关节炎:两项设计相似研究的结果。

Rofecoxib 12.5 mg, rofecoxib 25 mg, and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis: results of two similarly designed studies.

作者信息

Smugar Steven S, Schnitzer Thomas J, Weaver Arthur L, Rubin Bernard R, Polis Adam B, Tershakovec Andrew M

机构信息

Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA 19486-0004, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1353-67. doi: 10.1185/030079906X104876.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of rofecoxib and celecoxib for the treatment of knee or hip OA over 6 weeks.

METHODS

Two similarly designed, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Patients were randomly assigned 3:3:3:1 in Study 1 to once daily (QD) rofecoxib 12.5 mg (N = 456), rofecoxib 25 mg (N = 459), celecoxib 200 mg (N = 456), or placebo (N = 150) and 3:3:1 in Study 2 to QD rofecoxib 25 mg (N = 471), celecoxib 200 mg (N = 460), or placebo (N = 151). There was no rofecoxib 12.5 mg arm in Study 2. The primary outcome measure of both studies was pain at night over 6 weeks for rofecoxib 25 mg vs. celecoxib 200 mg. Efficacy comparisons with rofecoxib 12.5 mg in Study 1 were included as pre-specified study objectives but not as pre-specified study hypotheses. Secondary endpoints included Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART) over 6 weeks and over 1 week. Safety was evaluated through the assessment of spontaneously reported adverse experiences (AEs), evaluation of vital signs, and laboratory data reported by investigators and patients.

RESULTS

For the primary endpoint, reduction in pain at night over 6 weeks in Study 1 was not significantly different between active treatments; in Study 2 rofecoxib 25 mg significantly (p = 0.023) reduced pain at night compared with celecoxib 200 mg over 6 weeks. For the secondary endpoints, in both studies, significantly (p < 0.05) more patients treated with rofecoxib 25 mg than celecoxib 200 mg had a good or excellent PGART over 6 weeks, and over the first week (p < 0.01). In both studies, there were no significant differences between active medications in the incidence of reported overall, serious, or drug-related AEs. The reported AE rates with the active treatments were generally similar to those with placebo in the two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Rofecoxib 25 mg was significantly better than celecoxib 200 mg in relieving night pain at 6 weeks in one study; this was not confirmed in the accompanying study.

摘要

目的

比较罗非昔布和塞来昔布治疗膝或髋骨关节炎6周的疗效。

方法

两项设计相似的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。在研究1中,患者按3:3:3:1随机分配,分别接受每日一次(QD)的罗非昔布12.5毫克(N = 456)、罗非昔布25毫克(N = 459)、塞来昔布200毫克(N = 456)或安慰剂(N = 150)治疗;在研究2中,患者按3:3:1随机分配,分别接受QD罗非昔布25毫克(N = 471)、塞来昔布200毫克(N = 460)或安慰剂(N = 151)治疗。研究2中没有罗非昔布12.5毫克组。两项研究的主要结局指标均为罗非昔布25毫克与塞来昔布200毫克相比6周夜间疼痛情况。在研究1中与罗非昔布12.5毫克进行疗效比较作为预先指定的研究目标,但不作为预先指定的研究假设。次要终点包括6周和1周的患者总体治疗反应评估(PGART)。通过评估自发报告的不良事件(AE)、生命体征以及研究者和患者报告的实验室数据来评估安全性。

结果

对于主要终点,研究1中活性治疗组之间6周夜间疼痛减轻情况无显著差异;在研究2中,罗非昔布25毫克在6周时与塞来昔布200毫克相比显著(p = 0.023)减轻了夜间疼痛。对于次要终点,在两项研究中,接受罗非昔布25毫克治疗的患者在6周及第一周时PGART良好或优秀的比例显著(p < 0.05)高于接受塞来昔布200毫克治疗的患者(p < 0.01)。在两项研究中,活性药物在报告的总体、严重或与药物相关的AE发生率方面无显著差异。两项研究中活性治疗组报告的AE发生率通常与安慰剂组相似。

结论

在一项研究中,罗非昔布25毫克在6周时缓解夜间疼痛方面显著优于塞来昔布200毫克;但在另一项伴随研究中未得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验