Kesselheim Aaron S, Fischer Michael A, Avorn Jerry
Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):1095-102. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.1095.
Recent revelations of unexpected side effects of widely prescribed medications have raised questions about several aspects of U.S. drug policy, from initial Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval to promotion by manufacturers and prescribing by physicians. One prominent example is nesiritide (Natrecor), a treatment for congestive heart failure. We use it as a case study to assess how FDA standards for drug approval, marketing practices by drug manufacturers, and physicians' prescribing choices can shape the risk-benefit relationship of new drugs. Based on the nesiritide experience, we suggest several ways to improve policies for drug approval, postmarketing surveillance, and drug utilization.
近期广泛使用的药物出现意外副作用的情况引发了人们对美国药物政策多个方面的质疑,从美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的初始批准到制药商的推广以及医生的处方行为。一个突出的例子是奈西立肽(诺立生),一种用于治疗充血性心力衰竭的药物。我们将其作为案例研究,以评估FDA的药物批准标准、制药商的营销行为以及医生的处方选择如何影响新药的风险效益关系。基于奈西立肽的经验,我们提出了几种改进药物批准、上市后监测和药物使用政策的方法。