Suppr超能文献

应用于性行为自我报告的交互式语音应答技术:三种方法的比较

Interactive Voice Response Technology applied to sexual behavior self-reports: a comparison of three methods.

作者信息

Schroder Kerstin E E, Johnson Christopher J, Wiebe John S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Utah State University, 2810 Old Main Hill, Logan, Utah 84322-2810, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2007 Mar;11(2):313-23. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9145-z.

Abstract

We tested the feasibility and performance of the Interactive Voice Response Technology (IVR) in the assessment of sexual behavior self-reports, relative to self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) and Timeline Followback (TLFB) methods. The sample consisted of 44 sexually active Hispanic students recruited at the University of Texas at El Paso who reported daily about sexual behaviors and substance use. Thirty-three participants (75%, 18 women, 15 men) were retained for at least 80 days of the 91-day IVR. At follow-up, sexual behaviors and substance use were assessed by questionnaire (summary) reports and by TLFB, referring to the same 3-month interval. ANOVAs with normalized variables indicated less reporting in the TLFB and over-reporting of substance use in the questionnaire relative to the daily IVR self-reports. Gender moderated the effects of assessment mode, which were observed among women only. HLM analyses indicated a significant decrease in self-reports over time, suggesting reactivity of self-monitoring via IVR on behavior.

摘要

我们测试了交互式语音应答技术(IVR)在评估性行为自我报告方面的可行性和性能,并将其与自行填写问卷(SAQ)和时间线追溯法(TLFB)进行了比较。样本包括44名在德克萨斯大学埃尔帕索分校招募的性活跃的西班牙裔学生,他们每天报告性行为和物质使用情况。在91天的IVR期间,33名参与者(75%,18名女性,15名男性)至少保留了80天。在随访时,通过问卷(总结)报告和TLFB评估性行为和物质使用情况,均指同一3个月的时间段。对标准化变量进行的方差分析表明,相对于每日IVR自我报告,TLFB中的报告较少,而问卷中物质使用情况的报告则存在过度报告。性别调节了评估方式的影响,这种影响仅在女性中观察到。分层线性模型分析表明,随着时间的推移,自我报告显著减少,这表明通过IVR进行自我监测对行为具有反应性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验