Suppr超能文献

既往剖宫产或阴道分娩:第二次分娩时哪种方式围产期死亡风险更高?

Previous caesarean or vaginal delivery: which mode is a greater risk of perinatal death at the second delivery?

作者信息

Richter Rolf, Bergmann Renate L, Dudenhausen Joachim W

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 May;132(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Jul 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of perinatal death after previous caesarean versus previous vaginal delivery, and pre-labour repeat caesarean versus trial of labour after previous caesarean.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the data of the Berlin Perinatal Registry from 1993 to 1999, 7556 second parous women with a previous caesarean delivery were compared with 55142 second parous women with a previous vaginal delivery, and those 1435 women with pre-labour repeat caesarean were compared with 6121 women with a trial of labour after previous caesarean delivery. The rates of perinatal death, stillbirth and intrapartum/neonatal death were analysed using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding variables and obstetric history.

RESULTS

A previous caesarean delivery was associated with a 40% excess risk of perinatal death and a 52% excess risk of stillbirth (p<0.05); the risk of intrapartum/neonatal death was not significantly increased. There were no significantly higher rates of intrapartum/neonatal death and of stillbirth in women trying a vaginal birth versus pre-labour repeat caesarean. But in most cases of antepartum death, labour was induced for that reason.

CONCLUSION

Consulting women about caesarean delivery for maternal request, the increased risk of perinatal death in further pregnancies should be discussed. After a previous caesarean delivery, a careful screening for several risk factors is necessary before recommending a trial of labour.

摘要

目的

比较既往剖宫产与既往阴道分娩后围产期死亡风险,以及临产前再次剖宫产与既往剖宫产术后试产的风险。

研究设计

利用1993年至1999年柏林围产期登记处的数据,将7556例有既往剖宫产史的经产妇与55142例有既往阴道分娩史的经产妇进行比较,将1435例临产前再次剖宫产的妇女与6121例既往剖宫产术后试产的妇女进行比较。使用多变量逻辑回归分析围产期死亡、死产和产时/新生儿死亡的发生率,以调整混杂变量和产科病史。

结果

既往剖宫产与围产期死亡风险增加40%以及死产风险增加52%相关(p<0.05);产时/新生儿死亡风险未显著增加。与临产前再次剖宫产相比,试产妇女的产时/新生儿死亡和死产发生率没有显著更高。但在大多数产前死亡病例中,因此引产。

结论

对于因产妇要求而行剖宫产的情况,应与产妇讨论再次妊娠时围产期死亡风险增加的问题。既往剖宫产术后,在建议试产之前,有必要对多个风险因素进行仔细筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验