Dummin L J, Cox M, Plant L
BreastScreen South Australia, 1 Goodwood Road, Wayville SA 5034, Australia.
Breast. 2007 Feb;16(1):38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
Concise preoperative assessment of breast Tumor size is important when considering surgical approach and the staging of breast cancer. A retrospective study of 400 uni-focal, invasive ductal carcinomas compared the accuracy of sonographic and mammographic measuring modalities with histological size. Sub-groups for tumor size, type and grade, with other variables, were also considered in intra-modal correlations of lesion dimension. Mammography (R2=0.74), although slightly over estimating tumor size, appeared to be more useful than sonography (R2=0.60) following logistical analysis of the data. Correlational significance for both imaging modalities decreased for tumors larger than 20mm. Sonography under estimated lesions in over 50% of cases; the average underestimate being 9.9 mm, and ranging from 1mm to 30 mm. Consideration of both imaging measurements in cohort should improve the accuracy of radiological reporting of pre-surgical tumor size.
在考虑手术方式和乳腺癌分期时,对乳腺肿瘤大小进行简洁的术前评估非常重要。一项对400例单灶性浸润性导管癌的回顾性研究,比较了超声和乳腺X线摄影测量方式与组织学大小的准确性。在病变维度的模态内相关性分析中,还考虑了肿瘤大小、类型和分级的亚组以及其他变量。对数据进行逻辑分析后发现,乳腺X线摄影(R2 = 0.74)虽然略微高估了肿瘤大小,但似乎比超声(R2 = 0.60)更有用。对于大于20mm的肿瘤,两种成像方式的相关性显著性均降低。超声在超过50%的病例中低估了病变;平均低估9.9mm,范围从1mm到30mm。在队列中综合考虑两种成像测量结果应能提高术前肿瘤大小的放射学报告准确性。