Whitehouse Darren J, Morioka Miyuki, Griffin Michael J
Human Factors Research Unit, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Somatosens Mot Res. 2006 Mar-Jun;23(1-2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/08990220600741119.
Vibrotactile thresholds depend on the characteristics of the vibration, the location of contact with the skin, and the geometry of the contact with the skin. This experimental study investigated vibrotactile thresholds (from 8 to 250 Hz) at five locations on the distal phalanx of the finger with two contactors: (i) a 1-mm diameter circular probe (0.78-mm(2) area) with a 1-mm gap to a fixed circular surround (i.e., 7.1-mm(2) excitation area), and (ii) a 6-mm diameter circular probe (28-mm(2) area) with a 2-mm gap to a fixed circular surround (i.e., 79-mm(2) excitation area). With both contactors, especially the smaller contactor at low frequencies (i.e., 8, 16, and 31.5 Hz), thresholds decreased towards the tip of the finger, although there was little variation around the whorl. With low frequencies of vibration, and at all five locations on the finger, similar thresholds were obtained with both contactors, consistent with the NPI channel not changing in sensitivity with a change in the area of stimulation. At high frequencies (i.e., 63, 125, and 250 Hz), thresholds were lower with the larger area of stimulation at all locations, except at the extreme tip of the finger, consistent with spatial summation in the Pacinian channel. It is concluded that with a 6-mm diameter contactor, moderate variations in location around the whorl have little influence on the measured thresholds. With the 1-mm diameter contactor there were greater variations in thresholds and extreme locations, near the nail and the distal interphalangeal joint, may be unsuitable for investigating sensorineural disorders.
振动触觉阈值取决于振动的特性、与皮肤接触的位置以及与皮肤接触的几何形状。本实验研究使用两种接触器,对手指末节指骨上的五个位置处的振动触觉阈值(8至250赫兹)进行了研究:(i)一个直径1毫米的圆形探头(面积为0.78平方毫米),与固定的圆形周边有1毫米的间隙(即激发面积为7.1平方毫米),以及(ii)一个直径6毫米的圆形探头(面积为28平方毫米),与固定的圆形周边有2毫米的间隙(即激发面积为79平方毫米)。使用这两种接触器时,尤其是低频(即8、16和31.5赫兹)下的较小接触器,阈值朝着指尖方向降低,尽管在指纹周围变化不大。在低频振动时,以及在手指上的所有五个位置处,使用两种接触器获得的阈值相似,这与神经病理指数通道的敏感性不会随刺激面积的变化而改变一致。在高频(即63、125和250赫兹)时,除了手指的最末端外,在所有位置处,较大刺激面积下的阈值较低,这与帕西尼小体通道中的空间总和一致。得出的结论是,使用直径6毫米的接触器时,指纹周围位置的适度变化对测量的阈值影响不大。使用直径1毫米的接触器时,阈值变化更大,靠近指甲和远侧指间关节的极端位置可能不适合用于研究感觉神经性疾病。