Suppr超能文献

压力性尿失禁治疗中患者感知的结果:聚焦于尿道注射疗法。

Patient-perceived outcomes in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: focus on urethral injection therapy.

作者信息

Chapple Christopher R, Brubaker Linda, Haab François, van Kerrebroeck Philip, Robinson Dudley

机构信息

Urology Research Department, J Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Feb;18(2):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0148-0. Epub 2006 Jul 18.

Abstract

Intervention for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is generally focused on minimizing urinary leakage. However, the overall impact of SUI therapy on patients' quality of life is, arguably, more important than leakage outcomes. We performed a literature search to investigate the effect of urethral injection therapy on quality of life. Significant quality-of-life improvements have been observed with a number of injectable agents, while there is a distinct lack of correlation between subjective and objective outcomes. Two studies comparing urethral injection therapy with surgical intervention found superior objective efficacy with surgery, but no significant differences in quality-of-life improvements. Personal goals of patients undergoing urethral injection are yet to be explored, but there may be willingness to trade a lower success rate in favor of a more minor treatment procedure. In conclusion, quality-of-life improvements after urethral injection appear significant and comparable to those obtained with surgery. Further study of patients' own perceptions, pre- and posttreatment, would be valuable.

摘要

压力性尿失禁(SUI)的治疗通常侧重于尽量减少尿液泄漏。然而,可以说,SUI治疗对患者生活质量的总体影响比泄漏结果更为重要。我们进行了一项文献检索,以研究尿道注射疗法对生活质量的影响。使用多种注射剂已观察到生活质量有显著改善,而主观和客观结果之间明显缺乏相关性。两项比较尿道注射疗法与手术干预的研究发现,手术的客观疗效更佳,但在生活质量改善方面无显著差异。接受尿道注射治疗的患者的个人目标尚待探索,但患者可能愿意以较低的成功率换取更微创的治疗方法。总之,尿道注射后生活质量的改善似乎很显著,且与手术相当。进一步研究患者治疗前后的自身看法将很有价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验