Menkowitz Marc, Stieber Jonathan R, Wenokor Cornelia, Cohen Jason D, Donald Gordon D, Cresanti-Dakinis Charles
Department of Orthopaedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ 07740, USA.
Pain Physician. 2005 Apr;8(2):163-6.
Discography has been widely used in the lumbar and cervical spine as a diagnostic tool to identify sources of discogenic pain that may be amenable to surgical treatment. Discography in the cervical spine is currently performed without the benefit of pressure monitoring, and corresponding pressure parameters have not been determined.
The purpose of this study was to develop the framework for intradiscal pressure monitoring in the cervical spine and the basis for a pressure curve that will reflect clinically significant cervical internal disc disruption. We also sought to determine whether there is any pressure increase in adjacent discs during cervical discography that might result in false-positive diagnosis during in-vivo discography. An additional goal was to establish safe upper parameters for infusion volume and intradiscal pressure in the cervical spine.
Investigation of fresh-frozen discs in the cervical spine.
Investigated were 26 discs in 5 fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spines aged 45 to 68 with no prior history of cervical spine disease. A T2 MRI was performed on each specimen and radiographically abnormal discs were noted. Pressure-controlled, fluoroscopically guided discography was performed on each level using a right lateral approach. Opening pressure, rupture pressure, volume infused, and location of rupture were recorded. Pressures were simultaneously recorded at each adjacent disc level using additional pressure monitors and identical needle placement. Immediately following discography, CT was performed on each specimen according to the discography protocol.
Twenty-six discs C2-3 to C7-T1 were grossly intact for evaluation. The median opening pressure was 30 psi (range 14-101 psi). Two discs did not rupture and were pressurized to 367 psi. In 24 discs, the median intradiscal rupture pressure was 40 psi (range 14-171 psi). The median volume infused at rupture was 0.5 ml (range 0.25-1.0 ml). When grouped, the median intradiscal rupture pressure in the C2-3, C3-4, and C7-T1 discs was 53 psi (range 16-171 psi) compared to 36.5 psi (range 14-150 psi) in the C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7 discs (p=0.18). There was no measurable pressure change in any of the 30 adjacent disc levels evaluated.
In the cervical spine, iatrogenic disc injury may be caused at significantly lower pressures and volumes infused than in the lumbar spine. There was no measurable pressure change in any of the adjacent disc levels evaluated at maximum intradiscal pressurization. Further cadaveric testing will be necessary to develop parameters for intradiscal pressure monitoring in the cervical spine.
椎间盘造影术已广泛应用于腰椎和颈椎,作为一种诊断工具,用于识别可能适合手术治疗的椎间盘源性疼痛的来源。目前颈椎椎间盘造影术在没有压力监测的情况下进行,相应的压力参数尚未确定。
本研究的目的是建立颈椎椎间盘内压力监测的框架以及反映临床上显著颈椎椎间盘内部破裂的压力曲线的基础。我们还试图确定颈椎椎间盘造影术期间相邻椎间盘是否存在压力增加,这可能导致体内椎间盘造影术出现假阳性诊断。另一个目标是确定颈椎输注量和椎间盘内压力的安全上限参数。
对颈椎新鲜冷冻椎间盘进行研究。
研究对象为5个新鲜冷冻尸体颈椎中的26个椎间盘,年龄在45至68岁之间,既往无颈椎疾病史。对每个标本进行T2 MRI检查,并记录影像学异常的椎间盘。使用右侧入路在每个节段进行压力控制、透视引导下的椎间盘造影术。记录开放压力、破裂压力、注入量和破裂位置。使用额外的压力监测器和相同的针放置方法,在每个相邻椎间盘节段同时记录压力。椎间盘造影术后立即根据椎间盘造影方案对每个标本进行CT检查。
对26个C2 - 3至C7 - T1椎间盘进行大体完整评估。开放压力中位数为30 psi(范围14 - 101 psi)。两个椎间盘未破裂,加压至367 psi。在24个椎间盘中,椎间盘内破裂压力中位数为40 psi(范围14 - 171 psi)。破裂时注入量中位数为0.5 ml(范围0.25 - 1.0 ml)。分组后,C2 - 3、C3 - 4和C7 - T1椎间盘的椎间盘内破裂压力中位数为53 psi(范围16 - 171 psi),而C4 - 5、C5 - 6和C6 - 7椎间盘为36.5 psi(范围14 - 150 psi)(p = 0.18)。在所评估的30个相邻椎间盘节段中,没有一个出现可测量的压力变化。
在颈椎,医源性椎间盘损伤可能在比腰椎更低的压力和注入量下发生。在椎间盘内最大加压时,所评估的任何相邻椎间盘节段均未出现可测量的压力变化。需要进一步的尸体测试来制定颈椎椎间盘内压力监测的参数。