Olubayo R O, Mihok S, Wesonga D F, Mbwabi E R
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, National Veterinary Research Centre, Nairobi.
Acta Trop. 1991 Aug;49(3):173-83. doi: 10.1016/0001-706x(91)90036-j.
Five waterbuck (Kobus defassa) and four Boran cattle (Bos indicus) were infected with Trypanosoma congolense IL2895 using Glossina morsitans morsitans. At the same time, two waterbuck and two cattle were inoculated intravenously with bloodstream forms. With both methods of challenge, cattle had short prepatent periods followed by a continuous high parasitaemia. All cattle became severely anaemic and had to be treated with trypanocidal drugs to prevent death. In contrast, tsetse and intravenous challenge of waterbuck resulted in a long prepatent period, followed by brief, intermittent levels of low parasitaemia, and eventual selfcure. Waterbuck did not become anaemic, even during short bouts of parasitaemia which in general were very low. Both cattle and waterbuck developed parasite-specific antibodies, but some waterbuck failed to develop neutralizing antibodies. These results suggest that the ability of the waterbuck to resist trypanosome infection may not be mediated entirely by antibody-dependent immune processes.
使用冈比亚采采蝇(Glossina morsitans morsitans)将五头水羚(Kobus defassa)和四头博拉牛(Bos indicus)感染了刚果锥虫(Trypanosoma congolense)IL2895。同时,对两头水羚和两头牛静脉接种血液内期虫体。通过这两种攻击方法,牛的潜伏期较短,随后出现持续的高寄生虫血症。所有牛都出现严重贫血,必须用杀锥虫药物进行治疗以防止死亡。相比之下,采采蝇叮咬和静脉接种攻击水羚导致潜伏期较长,随后是短暂的、间歇性的低寄生虫血症水平,并最终自愈。即使在通常非常低的短暂寄生虫血症发作期间,水羚也没有出现贫血。牛和水羚都产生了寄生虫特异性抗体,但一些水羚未能产生中和抗体。这些结果表明,水羚抵抗锥虫感染的能力可能并非完全由抗体依赖性免疫过程介导。