Suppr超能文献

毛霉菌病眼眶内容剜除术的适应证。

Indications for orbital exenteration in mucormycosis.

作者信息

Hargrove Roderick N, Wesley Ralph E, Klippenstein Kimberly A, Fleming James C, Haik Barrett G

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, The Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;22(4):286-91. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000225418.50441.ee.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether evidence-based standards exist regarding the indications for orbital exenteration in patients with orbital mucormycosis.

METHODS

A literature review was performed of 113 articles (1943 to 2004). Factors possibly related to patient survival were analyzed. Additionally, a survey was sent to all ASOPRS Fellowship Preceptors to ascertain the frequency, outcome, treatment modalities, and indications for exenteration by these practicing physicians.

RESULTS

For published cases, parameter estimates (PE <or= 1.00) indicated that patients with mucormycosis with age >46 years, frontal sinus involvement, and fever were less likely to survive compared with patients without these conditions. Patients treated with amphotericin B (OR, 4.476) and those with diabetes (OR, 4.987) were more likely to survive compared with patients without these conditions. Exenterated patients with fever were more likely to survive compared with nonexenterated patients with fever (P=0.0468). Thirty-four ASOPRS Fellowship Preceptors received surveys; 26 (76%) completed the survey. Responses to specific survey questions showed a varied experience and indication for exenteration throughout the country.

CONCLUSIONS

: Our study underscores the lack of adequate data regarding the evaluation of treatment of orbital mucormycosis. No standard of care currently exists to guide physicians on when exenteration may benefit a mucormycosis patient. Further study is needed to determine which variables indicate the extent of disease and which variables or analytic scheme might predict the progression of orbital mucormycosis with or without exenteration.

摘要

目的

确定关于眼眶毛霉菌病患者眼眶内容剜除术适应证是否存在循证医学标准。

方法

对113篇文章(1943年至2004年)进行文献综述。分析可能与患者生存相关的因素。此外,向所有美国眼科整形与重建外科学会(ASOPRS)专科住院医师培训导师发放调查问卷,以确定这些执业医师进行眼眶内容剜除术的频率、结果、治疗方式及适应证。

结果

对于已发表的病例,参数估计(PE≤1.00)表明,与无这些情况的患者相比,年龄>46岁、累及额窦且发热的毛霉菌病患者存活可能性较小。与无这些情况的患者相比,接受两性霉素B治疗的患者(比值比[OR],4.476)及患有糖尿病的患者(OR,4.987)存活可能性较大。与未接受眼眶内容剜除术且发热的患者相比,接受眼眶内容剜除术且发热的患者存活可能性更大(P = 0.0468)。34位ASOPRS专科住院医师培训导师收到调查问卷;26位(76%)完成了调查。对特定调查问卷问题的回答显示,全国各地在眼眶内容剜除术的经验和适应证方面存在差异。

结论

我们的研究强调了在眼眶毛霉菌病治疗评估方面缺乏充分数据。目前不存在指导医师确定眼眶内容剜除术何时可能使毛霉菌病患者获益的护理标准。需要进一步研究以确定哪些变量表明疾病程度,以及哪些变量或分析方案可预测眼眶毛霉菌病无论是否进行眼眶内容剜除术的进展情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验