Rowan Jean P, Simon James A, Speroff Leon, Ellman Herman
Clinical Research Consultancy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Clin Ther. 2006 Jun;28(6):921-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.06.013.
Based on the potential risks of post-menopausal hormone therapy (HT) found by the Women's Health Initiative, guidelines for HT now recommend use of the lowest effective dose and shortest treatment duration consistent with individual treatment goals. Current (2003) guidance established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends that clinical assessments of HT include women with more frequent and more intense vasomotor symptoms than previously studied. Therefore, this analysis was conducted to further assess the efficacy of a low-dose combination of norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol (NA/EE) previously assessed in dose-ranging studies, while meeting conservative FDA trial design and analysis criteria.
The aim of this post hoc analysis and overview was to present data on the efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose combination-NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg-in the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms, based on data from previously published studies of NA/EE. In addition, the effects of low-dose NA/EE on bone and endometrium are briefly reviewed.
Data from 3 previously published randomized, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed using current FDA guidance for the assessment of HT in postmenopausal women. Studies 1 and 2 assessed the efficacy of NA/EE at various doses, including 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, in vasomotor symptom (hot-flush [HF]) relief over 16 and 12 weeks, respectively, using self-reporting of symptom frequency and intensity (scores: 0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; and 3=severe) in daily diaries. Study 3 assessed the effects of NA/EE at various doses, including 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, on bone and endometrium, using quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine at 12 and 24 months and endometrial biopsy at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. In all 3 studies, women were asked to record vaginal bleeding and spotting in diaries. Any adverse events were recorded in diaries and/or at clinic visits. Physical and gynecologic examinations and standard clinical laboratory testing were conducted at baseline and at appropriate follow-up visits in all 3 studies.
Studies 1, 2, and 3 enrolled 219, 266, and 1265 women, respectively. Overall, in studies 1 and 2, 91% of women were white, the mean age was approximately 52 years, and mean time since last menstrual period was approximately 24 months. In study 1, NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg was associated with significant reductions from baseline in mean weekly total HF frequency from week 4 (63.6%) through week 16 (73.7%) (all, P<0.05). In study 2, the frequency of moderate or severe HFs was decreased by 61.1% at week 4 (P<0.05) and by 82.2% at week 12 (P<0.001) with NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, and the mean intensity score was significantly lower than that with placebo at weeks 8 and 12 (both, P=0.001). In study 3, cumulative amenorrhea rates were approximately 90% in the NA/EE 0.5-mg/2.5-microg and placebo groups at 12 months. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was maintained at 24 months with NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg but was significantly decreased from baseline, by 7.4%, in the placebo group (P<0.001). Endometrial hyperplasia was not observed in the group receiving NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg over 24 months. The tolerability of NA/EE was similar to that of placebo. The most common adverse events experienced with NA/EE were headache (15.2%), abdominal pain (10.2%), and breast pain (9.0%).
The results from this post hoc analysis and overview of 3 previously published studies suggest that NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg was associated with decreased frequency and intensity of vasomotor symptoms. This dose of NA/EE was also associated with maintenance of BMD over 24 months, a significant positive effect on BMD compared with placebo. Low-dose NA/EE was also associated with cumulative amenorrhea rates comparable to those of placebo and was not associated with endometrial hyperplasia. This dose was well tolerated, with rates of adverse events generally similar to those of placebo.
基于女性健康倡议(Women's Health Initiative)发现的绝经后激素治疗(HT)的潜在风险,目前HT指南建议使用与个体治疗目标一致的最低有效剂量和最短治疗疗程。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)在2003年制定的现行指南建议,HT的临床评估应纳入血管舒缩症状比以往研究中更频繁、更严重的女性。因此,开展本分析以进一步评估低剂量醋酸炔诺酮和炔雌醇(NA/EE)联合用药的疗效,该联合用药曾在剂量范围研究中进行过评估,同时满足FDA保守的试验设计和分析标准。
本事后分析及综述的目的是根据NA/EE既往发表研究的数据,呈现低剂量联合用药NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 μg治疗绝经后症状的疗效和耐受性数据。此外,简要回顾低剂量NA/EE对骨骼和子宫内膜的影响。
使用FDA现行指南对绝经后女性HT评估的方法,分析3项既往发表的随机、安慰剂对照试验的数据。研究1和研究2分别评估了NA/EE不同剂量(包括0.5 mg/2.5 μg)在16周和12周内缓解血管舒缩症状(潮热[HF])的疗效,通过每日日记中自我报告症状频率和强度(评分:0 = 无;1 = 轻度;2 = 中度;3 = 重度)。研究3评估了NA/EE不同剂量(包括0.5 mg/2.5 μg)对骨骼和子宫内膜的影响,在治疗12个月和24个月时采用腰椎定量计算机断层扫描,在治疗6个月、12个月、18个月和24个月时进行子宫内膜活检。在所有3项研究中,要求女性在日记中记录阴道出血和点滴出血情况。所有不良事件均记录在日记和/或门诊就诊时。在所有3项研究的基线期和适当的随访期进行体格检查、妇科检查和标准临床实验室检测。
研究1、2和3分别纳入2 I 9例、266例和1265例女性。总体而言,在研究1和研究2中,91%的女性为白人,平均年龄约52岁,距末次月经的平均时间约24个月。在研究1中,NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 μg组从第4周(63.6%)至第16周(73.7%)平均每周总潮热频率较基线显著降低(均P<0.05)。在研究2中,NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 μg组在第4周中度或重度潮热频率降低61.1%(P<0.05),在第12周降低82.2%(P<0.001),且在第8周和第12周平均强度评分显著低于安慰剂组(均P = 0.001)。在研究3中,NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 μg组和安慰剂组在12个月时累积闭经率约为90%。NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 μg组在24个月时腰椎骨矿物质密度(BMD)保持稳定,而安慰剂组BMD较基线显著降低7.4%(P<0.001)。接受NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 μg治疗24个月的组未观察到子宫内膜增生。NA/EE的耐受性与安慰剂相似。NA/EE最常见的不良事件为头痛(15.2%)、腹痛(10.2%)和乳房疼痛(9.0%)。
本对3项既往发表研究的事后分析及综述结果表明,NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 μg与血管舒缩症状频率和强度降低相关。该剂量的NA/EE还与24个月内BMD维持稳定相关,与安慰剂相比对BMD有显著的积极影响。低剂量NA/EE还与累积闭经率与安慰剂相当相关,且与子宫内膜增生无关。该剂量耐受性良好,不良事件发生率总体与安慰剂相似。